PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8778818

Recent developments in breast imaging.

Abstract

A review of breast imaging has already appeared in 1982 in this journal. Consequently, the present article concentrates on a discussion of only those developments of a more recent nature. Although the emphasis is placed on the physical aspects of the different imaging methods concerned, the essential factors relating to the clinical background and the associated radiation risk are also outlined. The completeness of detail depends on the present clinical importance of the method under discussion. X-ray mammography, which is still the most important breast imaging technique and has proved to be an effective method for breast cancer screening, is therefore treated in greater detail. Since the early 1980s, ultrasound B-mode scanning has evolved to an indispensable adjunct to x-ray mammography. For Doppler sonography, diaphanography, contrast-enhanced MRI, CT and DSA, the visualization of a tumour depends essentially on the enhanced vascularity of the lesion. Whether this will prove to be a reliable indicator for malignancy remains to be shown in controlled clinical studies. Common to all imaging systems is the increasing use of digital methods for signal processing, which also offers the possibility of computer-aided diagnosis by texture analysis and pattern recognition.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Säbel, H Aichinger. 1996. Recent developments in breast imaging.. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155%2F41%2F3%2F001

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Impact of various compression rates on interpretation of digital coronary angiograms.

According to the ACC/ACR/NEMA/ESC-guidelines, digital techniques should be replaced by cinefilm for coronary angiography. The ad hoc group of experts recently chose CD-R (CD recordable) as transport media and the JPEG standard for image compression. To avoid a possible loss of image quality, the guidelines allow a maximal data compression of only 2:1. This, however, leads to a considerable limitation: coronary angiograms cannot be viewed in real-time directly from CD. Since the possible influence of higher compression rates on image quality of coronary angiograms had not been investigated in a controlled study, we evaluated 8 various compression rates (ranging from 5:1 to 43:1) according to a prospective, randomized and blinded protocol. Four independent observers assessed 1440 angiograms using a semiquantitative score. We found that angiograms with a compression rate of 5:1 and 6:1 did not lead to a clinically relevant deterioration of image quality, whereas 11:1 was still acceptable, but 43:1 becomes unacceptable. Since no clinically relevant loss of information at a compression rate of 6:1 was experienced in our study, a modification of the ACC/ACJ/NEMA/ESC-guidelines allowing higher compression rates should be considered.

Angiography, Digital Subtraction

Observer performance methodologies for evaluating blood vessel visibility in MR angiograms using accurate geometric registration to high resolution x-ray angiograms.

Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) and two alternative forced choice (2AFC) methodologies for quantitatively assessing vessel visibility in MR angiography (MRA) were examined using x-ray angiography images as truth. The methodologies required MRA projection images with the same orientation and magnification as the x-ray images. Geometric distortions limited the quality of the registration. The observer performance measurements were compared to vessel contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) measurements. Receiver bandwidth (RBW) and magnetization transfer (MT) effects in 3D time-of-flight MRA were evaluated. Overall, applying MT significantly increased all three measurements while decreasing the RBW significantly improved the 2AFC and CNR measurements. The relative importance of both effects on the 2AFC measure increased as vessel diameter decreased, although statistical significance was limited by small samples for diameters less than approximately 0.7 mm. These results demonstrate the usefulness of these observer performance methodologies for MRA technique assessment.

Angiography, Digital Subtraction

Iopentol (Imagopaque) in vascular procedures. A multi-centre monitoring trial assessing adverse events and diagnostic information--results from 3,587 patients in Germany.

The aims of the present open, non-comparative survey were to study the safety and efficacy of iopentol (Imagopaque, Nycomed Imaging AS, Oslo, Norway) in a large patient group. In a series of German centres, 3,587 patients underwent various contrast-enhanced examinations with iopentol. The most frequent examinations were computed tomography (CT) (1,740), phlebography (462), and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) (493). Only 82 patients (2.3%) experienced one or more adverse events. Sixty-one (1.7%) of these events were possibly or probably caused by the contrast medium. A total of 111 adverse events were registered, 54 of mild, 42 of moderate and 12 of strong intensity, and 51 events required treatment. The most frequent adverse events were nausea (34), erythema (14) urticaria (9), taste sensation (6), circulatory reactions (5) and angina pectoris (5). The frequencies of adverse events were 2.9% in CT, 2.0% in DSA, 2.0% in phlebography, 1.6% in cardioangiography, and 0.4% in urography. Patients with arteriosclerosis, an earlier contrast medium reaction, multimorbidity or age over 70 years had a statistically significantly higher risk of experiencing an adverse event. Patient tolerance was very good; the mean score was 83% on a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from extremely bad (0%) to extremely good (100%). Efficacy, as measured on VAS, was determined. Technical quality was scored as 80%, contrast enhancement within the vessels as 80% and delineation of lesions as 79%. The results from this large patient population confirms the experience from clinical practice that iopentol is a safe, well tolerated and efficient contrast medium.

Angiography, Digital Subtraction