PubMed · 8800888
A step towards day case prostatectomy.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare laser prostatectomy, using both side-fire and contact lasers, with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) to identify the advantages and disadvantages of all three in the short-and long-term (1 year). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients were randomized into one of four groups undergoing TURP, side-fire laser prostatectomy alone, side-fire with debridement and contact laser prostatectomy. Strict entry criteria ensured that no patients with malignancy were selected. The patients were reviewed after 3, 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: The duration of operation and length of hospital stay were significantly shorter in those undergoing laser side-fire treatment than those undergoing TURP. However, the early (3-month) symptom score was significantly worse in those treated by side-fire laser than in those treated by side-fire laser with debridement. After 1 year there was no significant difference in mean symptom score and mean urinary flow rate among the four groups. CONCLUSION: Laser prostatectomy offers the prospect of a shorter theatre and hospital stay and, by debriding the thermocoagulated tissue, the early irritative symptoms were reduced, with a significant improvement in symptom score after 3 months in patients with small prostates.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
N Suvakovic, J R Hindmarsh. 1996. A step towards day case prostatectomy.. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410x.1996.08859.x
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.