PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8807721

Current trends in antithrombotic drug and device development.

Abstract

During the past decade, many significant developments in the clinical management of thrombotic and vascular disorders have occurred. In particular, several newer approaches for the prophylactic and therapeutic management of such disorders as venous thrombosis, acute myocardial infarction, and stroke have been introduced. This has been possible because of the understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in the thrombogenic process, which plays a key role in the pathophysiology of thrombotic and vascular disorders. With the increased knowledge of the pathophysiology of thrombosis have come advances in drug treatment possibilities. Advances in biotechnology and separation techniques have contributed to the development of many newer antithrombotic, anticoagulant, and thrombolytic drugs. Many new drugs and devices based on newer concepts are currently being tested in various clinical trials. Hirudin, hirulog, GPIIb/IIIa targeting antibodies, and tissue factor pathway inhibitor are some examples. From these current developments, it can be appreciated that antithrombotic drugs represent a wide spectrum of natural, synthetic, semisynthetic, and biotechnology-produced agents with marked differences in chemical composition, physicochemical properties, biochemical actions, and pharmacologic effects. The use of physical means to treat thrombotic disorders and advanced means of drug delivery add to the expanding nature of treatment. The endogenous actions of the antithrombotic drugs are quite complex. It is no longer valid to assume that an antithrombotic drug must produce an anticoagulant action in blood, as do the classical heparin and oral anticoagulants. Many of these new drugs do not produce any alteration of currently measurable blood-clotting parameters, yet they are effective therapeutic agents because of their interactions with the elements of the blood and the vasculature. Another perspective is that several of these agents require endogenous transformation to become active products. Therefore, it becomes important to rely on the pharmacodynamic actions of these agents rather than on other in vitro characteristics to assess potency or efficacy. Hematologic and vascular modulation play a key role in the mediation of the antithrombotic actions of these drugs, involving red cells, white cells, platelets, endothelial cells, and blood proteins. Thus, an optimal antithrombotic drug approach will include the targeting of all possible sites involved in thrombogenesis. Antithrombotic and anticoagulant drugs will also be useful in the development of such biomedical devices as stents and other vascular support material. Polytherapeutic approaches utilizing combinations of drugs may turn out to be the most effective in the management of thrombotic disorders.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Fareed. 1996. Current trends in antithrombotic drug and device development.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8807721/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Fibromyalgia. Diagnostics--disease approach--therapy].

Fibromyalgia is a complex of symptoms predominantly affecting females and consisting of widespread pain. Etiology and pathogenesis are not sufficiently known yet, however, there is the assumption that fibromyalgia is looked at as being an illness with biological, psychological, and social aspects. Therefore, the treatment of fibromyalgia calls for a multimodal therapy approach. The importance of fibromyalgia has been recognized within the German health system by creating the new ICD code M79.70 and by assigning fibromyalgia its own rheumatologic DRG (I79Z). In future research of fibromyalgia special attention needs to be placed upon gender-specific problems.

Combined Modality Therapy↗

Lack of survival benefit of post-operative radiation therapy in prostate cancer patients with positive lymph nodes.

Randomized data from SWOG 8794 and EORTC 22911 confirm the benefit of post-operative radiation therapy (RT) for selected patients with pT3 prostate cancer (CaP) after radical prostatectomy (RP). However, data regarding the potential benefit of RT for patients post-RP with positive lymph node (+LN) involvement are limited. We analyzed the Surveillance Epidemiology End Results (SEER) registry for population-based data on efficacy of post-operative RT for +LN patients after RP. As LN data have only been captured by SEER since 1988, we analyzed data for 1988-1992, with specific attention to 10-year relative survival (defined as observed survival divided by the survival of a gender-, age- and race-matched population cohort without disease). Specifically analyzed were data for 1921 patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer who underwent surgery alone, or surgery followed by RT, and who had +LNs documented. SEER does not code the interval between surgery and RT, so the ratio of patients receiving salvage versus adjuvant therapy is unknown. Using follow-up data through 2002, post-diagnosis survival was examined by number of +LNs. There was no significant relative survival benefit for +LN patients receiving post-operative RT (chi(2)P=0.270). These data do not support routine use of post-operative RT for patients with +LNs in the surgical specimen.

Combined Modality Therapy↗