PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8813160

Rectal carcinoma: are we making a difference?

Abstract

Evaluation of preliminary results at our institution revealed an improvement in survival of patients treated for rectal cancer from 1950-1988. A study was conducted to analyze responsible factors. A total of 335 patients with accurate staging and follow up for at least 5 years or until death were reviewed retrospectively. Of the 335 patients, 295 (88%) were treated by surgical resection, abdominal perineal resection (APR) (n=179), and anterior resections (n=105), the most common procedures. Operative mortality for patients with curable disease (n=188) was 18 per cent (n=34), which has significantly decreased from 24 per cent (n=28) (1950-1969) to 8 per cent (n=6) (1970-1988), (P < 0.01). Operative mortality for APR and anterior resection was 22 per cent (n=29) and 8 per cent (n=5), respectively. Mortality for APR decreased from 28 per cent (1950-1969) to 10 per cent (1970-1988) (P < 0.02) accounting for most of the improvement. Of the 335 patients, 142 (42%) presented with stage IV disease, which decreased from 54 per cent (n=47) (1950s) to 22 per cent (n=10) (1980s), P < 0.01. The overall 5-year survival was 19 per cent (n=64), with a corresponding increase per decade from 13 per cent (1950s) to 43 per cent (1980s), (P < 0.001). Of the remaining 188 patients, 41 had involved surgical margins and decreased 5-year survival of 8 per cent when compared to patients with clear surgical margins (37%) P < 0.01). Multifactor analysis revealed that stage of disease at presentation, involved surgical margins, and operative mortality were significant independent variables. Earlier stage at presentation and improved operative management increased the survival of patients with rectal cancer at our institution.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Hurst, M Stamos, G Wilmoth, C Lin. 1996. Rectal carcinoma: are we making a difference?. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8813160/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Overall and cause-specific mortality in ulcerative colitis: meta-analysis of population-based inception cohort studies.

OBJECTIVES: It remains debated whether patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) are at greater risk of dying and whether a possible alteration in mortality can be attributed to specific causes of death. We aimed to clarify this issue by conducting a meta-analysis of population-based inception cohort studies on overall and cause-specific mortality in patients with UC. METHODS: The MEDLINE search engine and abstracts from international conferences were searched for relevant literature by use of explicit search criteria. STATA meta-analysis software was used to calculate pooled risk estimates (SMR, standardized mortality ratio, observed/expected deaths) of overall mortality and specific causes of death and to conduct metaregression analyses of the influence of specific variables on SMR. RESULTS: Ten papers fulfilled the inclusion criteria, reporting SMRs varying from 0.7 to 1.4. The overall pooled estimate was 1.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9-1.2, P= 0.42). However, greater risk of dying was observed during the first years of follow-up, in patients with extensive colitis, and in patients from Scandinavia. Metaregression analysis showed an increase in SMR by increasing cohort size. UC-related mortality accounted for 17% of all deaths. Mortality from gastrointestinal diseases, nonalcoholic liver diseases, pulmonary embolisms, and respiratory diseases was increased whereas mortality from pulmonary cancer was reduced. CONCLUSIONS: The overall risk of dying in patients with UC did not differ from that of the background population, although subgroups of patients were at greater risk of dying. The cause-of-death distribution seemed to differ from that of the background population.

Cause of Death↗