PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8820758

Entry-level degrees for midwifery practice.

Abstract

The Governing Board of the ACNM Division of Accreditation (DOA) has been charged by the ACNM Board of Directors to consider requiring an entry-level degree for nurse-midwifery practice. This decision has far-reaching implications and must be considered with utmost care. The decision will not be based on the issue of clinical competence but rather, the political statement to be made through the imposition of a degree requirement. The author urges the DOA's Governing Board to consider the implications of its action on a variety of audiences, including potential students, potential consumers, other health professionals, current and future employers, our international colleagues, health insurers and managed care organizations, and policymakers and lawmakers.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Lichtman. Entry-level degrees for midwifery practice.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-2182(95)00048-8

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system: digital vs plaster dental casts.

INTRODUCTION: The purposes of this study were to determine whether the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system (ABO OGS) can be assessed accurately from digital dental casts and whether there are statistical differences between digital and plaster dental casts in scoring the ABO OGS. METHODS: Thirty posttreatment plaster dental casts were selected and scanned by OrthoCAD (Cadent, Carlstadt, NJ) to produce 30 corresponding digital dental casts. The plaster and digital casts were compared by using the criteria of the ABO OGS. Because the data were ordinal, a nonparametic statistical analysis was used. RESULTS: The Wilcoxon test for paired samples showed significant differences between the plaster and digital casts for occlusal contacts, occlusal relationships, and total scores (P <.05). No significant differences were found for alignment, marginal ridges, overjet, and interproximal contacts. Buccolingual inclination was not included in this study because of inability to perform proper measurements with the OrthoCAD program. Mean differences of points deducted ranged from .03 point for marginal ridges to 5.07 points for the total score. The variable with the most points deducted related to occlusal relationships, and the fewest points were deducted for interproximal contacts. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this study, the current OrthoCAD program (version 2.2) was not adequate for scoring all parameters as required by the ABO OGS.

Certification↗