PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8821012

Euthanasia in the Netherlands.

H A ten Have·J V Welie
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A review of two decades of euthanasia advocacy reveals that the arguments in favor of euthanasia are not consistent. Although the Dutch debate on euthanasia started as a protest against contemporary medicine's power over death and dying, the general acceptance of euthanasia and recent litigation may have increased medical power by shifting the balance further in the direction of physicians. This article argues that the anxieties of some of the opponents of a euthanasia bill were justified.

Explore related subjects

Attitude to DeathDecision MakingEmpirical ResearchEthics, MedicalEuthanasiaEuthanasia, ActiveEuthanasia, Active, VoluntaryGovernment RegulationHumansInformed ConsentIntentionNetherlandsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Social ChangeStress, PsychologicalWithholding TreatmentDeath and EuthanasiaRemmelink CommissionJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H A ten Have, J V Welie. 1996. Euthanasia in the Netherlands.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-0704(05)70217-7

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Existence and pluralism: the rediscovery of Karl Jaspers.

Karl Jaspers has been recognized in psychiatry mostly for his influence on phenomenology and on certain aspects of psychopathology, such as our understanding of delusions. In this paper, I will highlight the need to rediscover Jaspers' work in terms of other important ideas that he can contribute to psychiatry, in particular the concepts of limit situations, transcendence and pluralism. Limit situations refer to the fact that human life is characterized by existential situations, or crises, which become opportunities for authentic existence. Transcendence refers to the notion that freedom is an important aspect of human existence and cannot be explained by purely scientific understanding or encompassed by any purely rationalistic system of thought. Pluralism is perhaps Jaspers' most original perspective, which has still failed to be adequately appreciated by the psychiatric profession. The idea here is that science means understanding the methods by which we obtain knowledge, along with the presuppositions and limits of those methods. Contemporary psychiatry has only a limited appreciation of Jaspers' work. In this paper, I attempt to describe these important concepts that can help us understand what we do in psychiatry, what we should be doing and why.

Attitude to Death↗