PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8830138

Essential elements in a qualitative dissertation proposal.

Abstract

This article clarifies the requirements of a qualitative research proposal, specifically a qualitative doctoral dissertation. The recommendations will be useful to graduate students and faculty members who are writing a qualitative proposal for the first time or who are critiquing one. A summary of assumptions of non-traditional research paradigms as they apply to inquiry design, a suggestion of the contents of the first three chapters of a qualitative dissertation (usually included in a dissertation proposal), and suggestions for ensuring rigor in the design and conduct of the dissertation research are included.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M M Swenson. 1996. Essential elements in a qualitative dissertation proposal.. https://doi.org/10.3928/0148-4834-19960401-15

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Factors modifying frequency of publications of clinical research results exemplified by medical dissertations].

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The problem of so-called "publication bias"--distortion of statements about an event by selective publication--is receiving growing attention. Assessment of the results of a given study can be affected by knowing the factors that favour or inhibit the publication of its results. METHODS: The data were based on an analysis of 371 medical doctoral dissertations on clinical research. Characteristic features of the dissertations were obtained by questionnaire, supplemented by MEDLINE search and, additionally, by personal enquiry about the publications. Bivariate and multivariate analysis of the characteristic features was used to evaluate the factors that influenced publication of a dissertation. RESULTS: There were mainly three factors that influenced the decision whether or not a dissertation was published: (1) a positive result of the study (odds ratio 2.5, 95% confidence interval 1.12-5.75); (2) the publishing activity of the dissertation's referee (odds ratio 3.8, 95% confidence interval 1.77-7.97; and (3) the quality of the statistical analysis of the dissertation's data (odds ratio 1.67, 95% confidence interval 0.99-2.80). CONCLUSION: A distinct publication bias can be demonstrated also in the case of doctoral dissertations in that positive results are clearly published more often than negative ones.

Academic Dissertations as Topic↗