Visual processing during high frequency head oscillation.

J P Flipse; A J Maas

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8830941

Visual processing during high frequency head oscillation.

J P Flipse·A J Maas

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

There is a discrepancy between the averaged amount of retinal slip measured during head movement and the expected level of visual performance. This study offers an explanation based on the sinusoidal velocity profile of the retinal image motion during head oscillation. Contrast thresholds were measured for stationary and moving 0.5 and 6 cycles per degree (c.deg-1) gratings with both passive oscillation (2-6 Hz) and fixation of the head. Eye and head movements were recorded with a magnetic induction coil technique. When expressed in terms of averaged retinal image motion, threshold contrast for the 0.5 c.deg-1 grating remained suboptimal, whereas the blurring of the 6 c.deg-1 grating appeared to be less during the head movement. The data obtained from head movement versus non-head movement conditions could, however, be matched when the oscillatory character of the retinal image motion was taken in to account. The amplitude of gaze movement was small relative to the size of the individual cycles in the 0.5 c.deg-1 grating. This reduced spatiotemporal interaction which rendered their visibility sub-optimal. Contrast thresholds for the 6 c.deg-1 grating were highly correlated to the duration of the time intervals in which the retinal slip was below the critical value of 2 deg.s-1. Intermittent exposure to quasi-stable retinal images explained the relatively high level of contrast sensitivity for the 6 c.deg-1 grating during head oscillations.

Explore related subjects

Contrast Sensitivity Eye Movements Head Movements Humans Oscillometry Reflex, Vestibulo-Ocular Retina Sensory Thresholds Time Factors Visual Perception Clinical Trial Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

J P Flipse, A J Maas. 1996. Visual processing during high frequency head oscillation.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8830941/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1999

The effects of contrast on perceived depth and depth discrimination.

The contrast dependence of perceived depth was quantified through a series of depth matching experiments. Perceived depth was found to be a power law function of contrast. In addition, subjects exhibited a large uncrossed depth bias indicating that low contrast test patterns appeared much farther away than high contrast patterns of equal disparity. For disparities in the range of +/- 4.0 arc min, matching disparities for low contrast patterns were shifted in the uncrossed direction by the same amount. In other words, while the magnitude of the uncrossed depth bias is a power law function of contrast, it is constant with respect to disparity. In a second series of experiments, the contrast dependence of stereo increment thresholds was measured. Like perceived depth and stereoacuity, stereo increment thresholds were found to be a power law function of contrast. These results suggest that contrast effects occur at or before the extraction of depth and have implications for the response properties of disparity-selective mechanisms.

Contrast Sensitivity↗

PubMed1999

Configuration saliency revealed in short duration binocular rivalry.

Supra-threshold spatial integration was studied by testing the saliency of multi-Gabor element configurations in short duration binocular rivalry (dichoptic masking) conditions. Dichoptic presentations allow for a competition between spatially overlapping supra-threshold stimuli that involve non-overlapping monocular receptive fields in the first stage of visual filtering. Different spatial configurations of Gabor patches (sigma = lambda = 0.12 degree) were presented to one eye (target) together with a bandpass noise presented to the other eye (mask). After a short rivalry period (120 ms) in which a dominance of one eye was established, a probe (a randomly positioned small rectangle of reduced contrast in the target) was presented for additional detection period (80 ms). Probe detection performance was measured (two-alternative-forced choice paradigm (2AFC) by finding the mask contrast leading to 79% correct response. Results show that configuration saliency is consistently expressed as dominance in short-duration binocular rivalry, with similar results obtained for longer durations (200 ms and continuous presentations). We find that textures of high-contrast randomly oriented patches are more dominant than uniform textures where the effect decreases and eventually reverses with decreasing of contrast. For supra-threshold contours, however, we find that smooth collinear contours are more dominant than 'jagged' ones, regardless of phase and contrast. These findings suggest principles underlying early lateral integration mechanisms based on contrast dependent inhibitory and excitatory connections. This mechanism could be based on iso-orientation surround (2D) inhibition and collinear (1D) facilitation, with inhibition being more effective at high contrasts.

Contrast Sensitivity↗

PubMed1999

Neuronal basis of contrast discrimination.

Psychophysical contrast increment thresholds were compared with neuronal responses, inferred from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to test the hypothesis that contrast discrimination judgements are limited by neuronal signals in early visual cortical areas. FMRI was used to measure human brain activity as a function of stimulus contrast, in each of several identifiable visual cortical areas. Contrast increment thresholds were measured for the same stimuli across a range of baseline contrasts using a temporal 2AFC paradigm. FMRI responses and psychophysical measurements were compared by assuming that: (1) fMRI responses are proportional to local average neuronal activity; (2) subjects choose the stimulus interval that evoked the greater average neuronal activity; and (3) variability in the observer's psychophysical judgements was due to additive (IID) noise. With these assumptions, FMRI responses in visual areas V1, V2d, V3d and V3A were found to be consistent with the psychophysical judgements, i.e. a contrast increment was detected when the fMRI responses in each of these brain areas increased by a criterion amount. Thus, the pooled activity of large numbers of neurons can reasonably well predict behavioral performance. The data also suggest that contrast gain in early visual cortex depends systematically on spatial frequency.

Contrast Sensitivity↗