PubMed · 8834929
Mega-trials: is meta-analysis an alternative?
Abstract
Large scale placebo-controlled trials with clinical end-points are not possible when other compounds with proven efficacy are already available. Hence, the question arises whether the available experience from placebo-controlled phase III trials can be analysed jointly to assess whether an effect on clinical end-points exists. This question was answered for the new ACE inhibitor ramipril, with which five exercise capacity trials were done in similar patients with heart failure. Meta-analysis showed that ramipril reduced the occurrence of the combined event death or hospitalisation by 32% (P = 0.05), based on the customary 'intention-to-treat' comparison for large scale trials. From this analysis, the lesson has been learnt that a drug development programme must be carefully planned to allow for this type of meta-analysis.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J Lubsen. 1996. Mega-trials: is meta-analysis an alternative?. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8834929/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.