PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8842136

Resistant hypertension: an overview.

F A McAlister·R Z Lewanczuk·K K Teo
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the factors contributing to treatment resistance in hypertensive patients and assess the evidence from therapeutic trials in these patients. DESIGN: A MEDLINE search using the words 'resistant hypertension', 'refractory hypertension' and 'treatment resistance, hypertension' was carried out to identify relevant articles. The bibliographies of articles were used to screen for other relevant articles. All available English-language articles on the epidemiology, prognosis and management of hypertension resistant to standard treatment were reviewed. RESULTS: Resistant hypertension is an important public health problem and a common reason for referral of patients to specialized hypertension clinics. Patients with uncontrolled hypertension are at increased risk of stroke, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure and renal failure. Many factors may play a role in the development of resistant hypertension, including misdiagnosis (pseudoresistance), noncompliance, occult secondary causes for hypertension, volume overload, obesity, cigarette smoking, excess alcohol intake, sleep apnea, interfering medications and suboptimal combinations of antihypertensives. Only beta-blockers and thiazide diuretics have been demonstrated to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension. The trials evaluating third-line agents in patients with resistant hypertension have demonstrated additional blood pressure lowering with all classes of agents, and the randomized controlled trials have not demonstrated any statistically significant differences between the agents in either efficacy or tolerability. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of the patient with resistant hypertension should include 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and an extensive search for hypertensive end organ damage. Contributing factors should be sought and stepped care should still form the basis for treatment decisions. The choice of third-line agent should be dictated by the patient's renin profile, current medication and any concomitant diseases.

Explore related subjects

Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsAntihypertensive AgentsChlorothiazideDrug ResistanceFemaleHumansHypertensionHypertension, MalignantMaleObesityOntarioRisk FactorsSmokingJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F A McAlister, R Z Lewanczuk, K K Teo. 1996. Resistant hypertension: an overview.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8842136/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies.

We consider Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies where the association between a binary exposure, binary response, measured confounders and a single binary unmeasured confounder can be formulated using logistic regression models. A model for unmeasured confounding is presented along with a family of prior distributions that model beliefs about a possible unknown unmeasured confounder. Simulation from the posterior distribution is accomplished using Markov chain Monte Carlo. Because the model for unmeasured confounding is not identifiable, standard large-sample theory for Bayesian analysis is not applicable. Consequently, the impact of different choices of prior distributions on the coverage probability of credible intervals is unknown. Using simulations, we investigate the coverage probability when averaged with respect to various distributions over the parameter space. The results indicate that credible intervals will have approximately nominal coverage probability, on average, when the prior distribution used for sensitivity analysis approximates the sampling distribution of model parameters in a hypothetical sequence of observational studies. We motivate the method in a study of the effectiveness of beta blocker therapy for treatment of heart failure.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2007

[Polypharmacy, compliance and non-prescription medication in patients with cardiovascular disease in Germany].

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The expenses of health insurances are continuously raising. With implementation of evidence-based medicine resulting in polypharmacy, compliance is decreasing and patients as well as physicians are facing unintentional drug interactions. Furthermore the arbitrary use of additional drugs apart from prescribed medication has to be considered. The objective of this study was to analyse polypharmacy, compliance and utilisation patterns for non-prescription medications (OTC) in patients with cardiovascular diseases. METHODS: 100 patients with cardiovascular diseases (45 women, 55 men, 58 - 87 years) were interviewed using a questionnaire. The compliance was determined by the Morisky-Score. RESULTS: 78 % of the patients received more than four pills every day (median 8.34). Most common products were beta-blockers (89 %), ACE-Inhibitors/Sartans (69 %) and aspirin (65 %). Only 52 % of the patients knew the indications of their medication. Although 83 % of the patients claimed to be absolutely compliant concerning their medication, the Morisky-Score revealed a high compliance only in 52 %. The compliance decreased significantly if the number of prescribed medication increased to more than four pills a day. 48 % of the patients took regularly non-prescription products, 35 % more than three additional products daily. Most commonly multivitamins, minerals, herbals and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were used. This non-prescription medication did not affect the compliance of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Polypharmacy with more than four pills daily leads to a lower compliance and can therefore influence the implementation of guideline-medicine. Non-prescription medication is widely used and should be considered because of their potential side-effects and drug interactions.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2007

Propranolol blocks chronic risperidone treatment-induced enhancement of spatial working memory performance of rats in a delayed matching-to-place water maze task.

RATIONALE: Atypical antipsychotics improve cognitive function, including working memory, in schizophrenia. Some atypical antipsychotics have been reported to activate the locus coeruleus and induce beta-adrenoceptor antagonist sensitive c-Fos-like immunoreactivity in the prefrontal cortex. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study investigated the effects of chronic treatment of rats with risperidone (1 mg kg(-1) day(-1) s.c.), clozapine (10 mg kg(-1) day(-1) s.c.), or acidified saline vehicle control for 2, 4, or 8 weeks on spatial working memory performance in a delayed matching-to-place water maze task with a 60-s inter-trial retention interval with and without acute challenge with propranolol (10 mg/kg i.p.). RESULTS: Treatment with risperidone for 8 weeks, but not 2 or 4 weeks, significantly improved working memory performance. In contrast, treatment with clozapine for up to 8 weeks did not improve working memory. Acute challenge with propranolol blocked the improvement in working memory produced by chronic treatment with risperidone, but had no significant effect on performance in saline- or clozapine-treated animals. CONCLUSIONS: The delayed matching-to-place water maze task may prove valuable in the investigation of the behavioural pharmacology of the cognitive effects of antipsychotic drugs. These data suggest that beta adrenoceptors may contribute to the cognitive effects of chronic treatment with atypical antipsychotics.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗