PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8843060

"Inhibition of return' without visual input.

Abstract

Inhibition of return (IOR) is the name that is associated with a response time (RT) delay to a visual stimulus presented at a recently cued spatial location. Two experiments with 26 undergraduates used an auditory analog to the visual IOR paradigm to examine whether manual RT inhibition would occur in the absence of visual input. In Experiment 1, subjects were instructed to prepare saccades, with their eyes closed, to the location of an auditory cue, and an RT delay to targets presented at the cued location was observed throughout the 1400 msec timecourse. Experiment 2 was used to examine the role of spatial distance between the auditory cue and the target, and found that as in the visual domain, there is a decrease in the magnitude of RT inhibition with increasing distance. Additionally, as in vision, support was found for the inhibition of targets presented in the same hemispace as the cue, whereas targets presented contralaterally were generally found to be facilitated. It was concluded that IOR is capable of acting in the auditory domain, and the possible neural origins of this effect are discussed. The result that IOR can occur even in the absence of visual input supports recent findings that perceptual representations of visual input are not the source of inhibition in this paradigm.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W C Schmidt. 1996. "Inhibition of return' without visual input.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(96)00015-2

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A low glycaemic index breakfast cereal preferentially prevents children's cognitive performance from declining throughout the morning.

This study investigated whether the glycaemic index (GI) of breakfast cereal differentially affects children's attention and memory. Using a balanced cross-over design, on two consecutive mornings 64 children aged 6-11 years were given a high GI cereal and a low GI cereal in a counterbalanced order. They performed a series of computerised tests of attention and memory, once prior to breakfast and three times following breakfast at hourly intervals. The results indicate that children's performance declines throughout the morning and that this decline can be significantly reduced following the intake of a low GI cereal as compared with a high GI cereal on measures of accuracy of attention (M=-6.742 and -13.510, respectively, p<0.05) and secondary memory (M=-30.675 and -47.183, respectively, p<0.05).

Attention↗

Inhibitory control test is a simple method to diagnose minimal hepatic encephalopathy and predict development of overt hepatic encephalopathy.

OBJECTIVES: To compare inhibitory control test (ICT), a simple/rapid test of attention, to a standard psychometric battery (SPT) to diagnose minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) and predict development of overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) in cirrhotic patients. METHODS: Fifty nonalcoholic cirrhotics and 50 age/educational-status-matched controls were given ICT and SPT in the same sitting. Performance impaired beyond two standard deviations of controls was considered MHE in cirrhotics. ICT results (lure/target response and lures/person) were compared between controls and cirrhotics and within cirrhotics with/without MHE. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis was used to study ICT for MHE diagnosis. Twenty subjects were administered SPT and ICT twice to assess test-retest reliability. All cirrhotics were followed routinely for the development of OHE. RESULTS: Cirrhotics performed worse than controls on SPT and ICT. Using SPT, 39 cirrhotics had MHE. ICT was administered faster than SPT (15 vs 37 min). Cirrhotics with MHE had significantly higher lure (28%vs 3%) and lower target response (91%vs 96%) compared with those without MHE. Lure/person >5 had 90% sensitivity/specificity for MHE diagnosis. AUC for receiver-operating characteristic for lures alone was 95.8%. Lure and target responses were highly correlated (r= 0.9) between sessions showing high test-retest reliability. Five (10%) patients developed OHE on f/u of 26 +/- 10 months; all five had been diagnosed with MHE using ICT and SPT. None of the five patients with discordant results on SPT and ICT developed OHE. CONCLUSIONS: ICT has good sensitivity/specificity for MHE diagnosis, is reliable and is equivalent to SPT for predicting OHE development.

Attention↗