PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8851964

[Three approaches to culpability. 2].

Abstract

The third and psychoanalytical approach to culpability will be conducted through the study of Freud's and A. Hesnard's works. We will see how Freud unravels the feeling of culpability and solves the enigma of its origins; in his opinion, il is transmitted through a philogenetical agency. Thanks to this conceptualisation we will be able to measure in what way Freud's writings were influenced by occidental culture. Eventually, we will tackle the question of A. Hesnard's phenomenological approach. It will lead to an original outlook in which culpability is at the care of every ethical behaviour.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F Guyot-Gans. 1995. [Three approaches to culpability. 2].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8851964/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[A separation of public health ethics from medical ethics].

Until now there are only a few approaches in the German-speaking realm to establish an explicit ethical framework for moral issues of public health--although a need for public health ethics in times of SARS and avian flu is obvious. One deficit of the discussion so far is that there is no systematic separation of medical ethics and public health ethics. Thus, the core and interdisciplinary focus of public health is often not met. However, to frame discussions of moral issues within a specific public health ethics framework seems to be fruitful. This paper deals with the conceptual differences of medical ethics and public health ethics. The discussion helps both applied ethical discourses to sharpen their focus and strengthen their appeal. The author develops and presents a conceptual and normative frame for public health ethics and offers a concise set of ethical principles for the discussion of moral challenges in public health.

Ethics, Medical↗