PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8866764

New antipsychotics: the present status.

Abstract

Until antipsychotics can be subdivided according to differentiated effects on psychic functions (for example on positive/negative symptoms and cognitive functions), the best classification seems to be one based upon receptor-binding profiles and the side effects that follow. Such a combined pharmacological-clinical approach appears fruitful to clinicians as well as pharmacologists. According to this classification the new antipsychotics can be subdivided into three main categories: the relatively pure dopamine antagonists (D2 antagonists, including sulpiride and amisulpiride); the dopamine (D2)-serotonin (5-HT2)-norepinephrine (alpha 1) antagonists (risperidone, ziprazidone and sertindole); and the multireceptor antagonists (clozapine, olanzapine and seroquel). Clozapine is still the most potent antipsychotic and the least potent at inducing extrapyramidal symptoms. New drugs such as olanzapine, seroquel and sertindole represent the further development of clozapine's positive qualities, while risperidone and ziprasidone are dominated to a greater extent by relatively traditional dopamine D2 receptor blockade.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Gerlach, L Peacock. 1995. New antipsychotics: the present status.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004850-199509000-00006

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Differential pharmacology of atypical antipsychotics: clinical implications.

PURPOSE: Pharmacology of atypical antipsychotics and the clinical implications are reviewed. SUMMARY: Psychiatric disorders, such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, are often associated with poor outcomes. Atypical antipsychotics have become the standard of care for these disorders, and multiple agents have demonstrated efficacy for both acute and maintenance therapy. As a result of their differential pharmacologic properties, atypical antipsychotics have diverse clinical profiles, resulting in different liabilities for specific adverse events. These effects can, in turn, have an adverse impact on patient functionality, adherence to therapy, and overall health. CONCLUSION: Atypical antipsychotics have distinct pharmacological profiles which result in clinically meaningful differences in adverse effects. Clinicians should have a wide choice of agents available with which to optimize outcomes in the majority of patients with psychiatric disorders.

Antipsychotic Agents↗