PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8896138

Continuous and group sequential conditional probability ratio tests for phase II clinical trials.

Abstract

We present continuous and group sequential designs for phase II clinical trials based on the sequential conditional probability ratio test (SCPRT). The SCPRT is derived from a conditional likelihood ratio, where the conditioning is on what the corresponding (reference) fixed sample size test (RFSST) would achieve. In other words, we obtain the sequential design by controlling the maximum probability that the SCPRT does not agree with the RFSST. We shall discuss the difference between SCPRT and stochastic curtailment which also uses the concept of conditional distribution. We show that the power function of the SCPRT is virtually the same as that of the RFSST and its average sample numbers (ASNs) are close to those of Wald's sequential probability ratio test (SPRT), whereas its maximum sample size is no greater than that of the RFSST. Thus the SCPRT has all the desirable properties, such as allowing the use of the RFSST at the last analysis, of the Fleming procedure for phase II trials. The SCPRT, however, preserves the power function of the RFSST better and gives us the option for continuous monitoring. Our recommendation, therefore, is to use a group SCPRT boundary (for interim analyses performed as scheduled) embedded in a continuous SCPRT boundary (for unplanned interim analyses and analyses at times based on data trends). We provide as well a bias-adjusted estimator of the success rate after sequential stopping. We illustrate the method with several examples. The method applies to any single-arm clinical trial with binary endpoints, such as the classic paired design.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Tan, X Xiong. 1996-10-15. Continuous and group sequential conditional probability ratio tests for phase II clinical trials.. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19961015)15%3A19%3C2037%3A%3Aaid-sim339%3E3.0.co%3B2-z

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Stochastically curtailed phase II clinical trials.

Phase II trials often test the null hypothesis H(0): p or=p(1), where p is the true unknown proportion responding to the new treatment, p(0) is the greatest response proportion which is deemed clinically ineffective, and p(1) is the smallest response proportion which is deemed clinically effective. In order to expose the fewest number of patients to an ineffective therapy, phase II clinical trials should terminate early when the trial fails to produce sufficient evidence of therapeutic activity (i.e. if p or=p(1)), the trial should declare the drug effective in the fewest patients possible to allow for advancement to a phase III comparative trial. Several statistical designs, including Simon's minimax and optimal designs, have been developed that meet these requirements. In this paper, we propose three alternative designs that rely upon stochastic curtailment based on conditional power. We compare and contrast the properties of the three approaches: (1) stochastically curtailed (SC) binomial tests, (2) stochastically curtailed (SC) Simon's optimal design, and (3) SC Simon's minimax design to those of Simon's minimax and Simon's optimal designs. For each of these designs we compare and contrast the number of opportunities for study termination, the expected sample size of the trial under the null hypothesis (p <or=p(0)), and the effective type I and type II errors. We also present graphical tools for monitoring phase II clinical trials with stochastic curtailment using conditional power.

Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic↗

Adaptive two-stage designs in phase II clinical trials.

Two-stage designs have been widely used in phase II clinical trials. Such designs are desirable because they allow a decision to be made on whether a treatment is effective or not after the accumulation of the data at the end of each stage. Optimal fixed two-stage designs, where the sample size at each stage is fixed in advance, were proposed by Simon when the primary outcome is a binary response. This paper proposes an adaptive two-stage design which allows the sample size at the second stage to depend on the results at the first stage. Using a Bayesian decision-theoretic construct, we derive optimal adaptive two-stage designs; the optimality criterion being minimum expected sample size under the null hypothesis. Comparisons are made between Simon's two-stage fixed design and the new design with respect to this optimality criterion.

Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic↗