PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8900478

Genotype/phenotype analyses of low frequency tumor cells using computerize image microscopy.

Abstract

Techniques to identify low frequency (i.e., 10(-4)-10(-5)) tumor cells in bone marrow and peripheral blood of cancer patients provide opportunities for early detection of disseminated disease and characterization of the properties of cells released from the tumor. Low frequency epithelial cells in marrow and blood can be detected using immunophenotypic markers directed against intracellular and/or cell surface antigens. However, nonspecific phenotypic labeling may compromise the ability to discriminate tumor from nontumor cells. We describe optimization of slide-based approaches that facilitate identification and subsequent molecular cytogenetic characterization of rare tumor cell populations in hematopoietic tissues. Colon tumor cells seeded in a hematopoietic background provided a model system to optimize methodologies that are applicable to detection and quantification of micrometastases in clinical specimens. Mixtures of cytogenetically aberrant epithelial cells and hematopoietic cells on slides were labeled with an anti-cytokeratin 20 (anti-CK20) antibody that recognizes > 90% of colon adenocarcinomas. Computerized image analysis was used to record the location of the immunofluorescent cells on microscopic slides. Cells on slides were then hybridized using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with repeat-sequence DNA probes to detect aneusomies. Previously discriminated epithelial cells were relocated for molecular cytogenetic characterization. Tumor cells present at frequencies approximating 5 x 10(-5) were discriminated on the basis of immunofluorescence and cell size. A low frequency (4 x 10(-4)) population of normal hematopoietic cells also labeled with anti-CK20 (data not shown). This strategy of sequential immunophenotyping and molecular cytogenetic analyses may be useful to discriminate tumor from nontumor cells in cancer patients with micrometastatic disease.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

V R Litle, S J Lockett, M G Pallavicini. 1996-04-01. Genotype/phenotype analyses of low frequency tumor cells using computerize image microscopy.. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0320(19960401)23%3A4%3C344%3A%3Aaid-cyto11%3E3.0.co%3B2-t

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Comparison of methods for analysis of selective genotyping survival data.

Survival traits and selective genotyping datasets are typically not normally distributed, thus common models used to identify QTL may not be statistically appropriate for their analysis. The objective of the present study was to compare models for identification of QTL associated with survival traits, in particular when combined with selective genotyping. Data were simulated to model the survival distribution of a population of chickens challenged with Marek disease virus. Cox proportional hazards (CPH), linear regression (LR), and Weibull models were compared for their appropriateness to analyze the data, ability to identify associations of marker alleles with survival, and estimation of effects when all individuals were genotyped (full genotyping) and when selective genotyping was used. Little difference in power was found between the CPH and the LR model for low censoring cases for both full and selective genotyping. The simulated data were not transformed to follow a Weibull distribution and, as a result, the Weibull model generally resulted in less power than the other two models and overestimated effects. Effect estimates from LR and CPH were unbiased when all individuals were genotyped, but overestimated when selective genotyping was used. Thus, LR is preferred for analyzing survival data when the amount of censoring is low because of ease of implementation and interpretation. Including phenotypic data of non-genotyped individuals in selective genotyping analysis increased power, but resulted in LR having an inflated false positive rate, and therefore the CPH model is preferred for this scenario, although transformation of the data may also make the Weibull model appropriate for this case. The results from the research presented herein are directly applicable to interval mapping analyses.

Genotype↗