PubMed · 8907781
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J E Corwin, T Landers. 1996. Case study: low back pain.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8907781/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: Observational studies have shown a link between constipation (CN) and psychiatric disorders, including Schizophrenia (SP), Bipolar disorder (BD), Schizoaffective disorder (SD), and Parkinson's disease (PD). However, it is still unknown whether CN affects the occurrence and development of psychiatric disorders or whether psychiatric disorders cause the occurrence and development of CN. Therefore, this study used Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to evaluate the relationship between CN and psychiatric disorders. METHOD: We used genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to assess the relationship between constipation (N = 411, 623) and four psychiatric disorders, including SP ( N = 77, 096), BD (N = 51, 710), SD ( N = 210, 962), PD (N = 482, 730 ), using bidirectional MR analysis. Inverse variance weighting (IVW), MR Egger (ME) and Weighted median (WM) were used as causal analysis methods. Cochran's Q test, funnel plot, MR Egger intercept test and Leave.one.out analysis were used to detect sensitivity. Confounding factors were analyzed and eliminated by LDtrait to avoid influencing the final MR Analysis result. RESULTS: The results of positive MR analysis indicated that there was no evidence of influence of constipation on SP (OR 1.043, 95%CI 0.946 - 1.149, P value = 0.398), BD (OR 1.114, 95%CI 0.995 - 1.248, P value = 0.062), SD (OR 0.934, 95%CI 0.674 - 1.294, P value = 0.682) and PD (OR 1.118, 95%CI 0.918 - 1.361, P value = 0.269) under gene prediction. Reverse MR analysis suggested that SP (OR 1.030, 95% CI 1.001-1.060, P value = 0.042) had a causal relationship with constipation. BD (OR 0.993, 95% CI 0.962-1.025, P value = 0.664), SD (OR 1.021, 95% CI 0.984-1.059, P value = 0.265) and PD (OR 1.004, 95% CI 0.974-1.035, P value = 0.790) were not associated with CN. CONCLUSION: There was a positive association between SP and CN. CN may have no exact causal relationship with BD, SD and PD, and the interaction mechanism between these diseases needs to be further explored.
Haemorrhoids are normal anatomic components of the anal canal, involved in the fine adjustment of continence. This physiological role requires normal size and location. The anatomical aspects of haemorrhoids do not reflect their symptomatic expression. Natural evolution of haemorrhoids is benign, but most often chronic, with spontaneous worsening. Despite recent advances in medical and instrumental treatments, about 10% of the patients need a radical and definitive treatment relying on surgery. This comfort-oriented surgery should only be proposed to handicapped patients, after information about the rare (but possible) complications and the unavoidable transitory postoperative discomfort.
The prevalence of bowel dysfunction in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients is higher than in the general population. Up to 70% of patients complain of constipation or faecal incontinence, which may also coexist. This overlap can relate to neurological disease affecting both the bowel and the pelvic floor muscles, or to treatments given. Bowel dysfunction is a source of considerable ongoing psychosocial disability in many patients with MS. Symptoms related to the bladder and the bowel are rated by patients as the third most important, limiting their ability to work, after spasticity and incoordination. Bowel management in patients with MS is currently empirical. Although general recommendations include maintaining a high fibre diet, high fluid intake, regular bowel routine, and the use of enemas or laxatives, the evidence to support the efficacy of these recommendations is scant. This review will examine the current state of knowledge regarding the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying bowel dysfunction in MS, outline the importance of proper clinical assessment of constipation and faecal incontinence during the diagnostic work-up, and propose various management possibilities. In the absence of clinical trial data on bowel management in MS, these should be considered as a consensus on clinical practice from a team specialized in bowel dysfunction.