PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8908679

Pharmacotherapy in erectile dysfunction agents for self-injection programs and alternative application models.

Abstract

Previously, men with erectile dysfunction (ED) were frequently treated with penile prosthesis implants or considered to have psychogenic impotence. Since the reports by Virag and Brindley in 1932 and 1983, pharmacotherapy, by self-injection programs has become a new therapeutic concept for impotent men. In clinical practice, this application model has been generally accepted as the "golden standard" in the treatment of ED. Papaverine was first used as monotherapy, but because of side-effects such as prolonged erection, priapism, and fibrosis of the corpus cavernosum, single use of the drug was abandoned. Instead, papaverine was introduced in mixtures, e.g. together with alpha adrenoceptor-blockers as phentolamine, and/or prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) in these "cocktails", the dose of papaverine is reduced to 10-15 mg compared to the high doses (80-120 mg) that were used initially. By having two or more drugs in the mixture, a facilitating cascade effect as probably obtained. PGE1 is the only drug that has been approved by the FDA and is today registered in more than 50 countries. Other combination therapies such as vasoactive intestinal polypeptide+ phentolamine, or calcitonin gene-related peptide+ PGE1, have been suggested as suitable alternatives for intracavernosal injection. Transdermal and intraurethral application models may be considered in selected patients. Recently, oral administration of a phosphodiesterase inhibitor (UK-92.480) was reported to improve penile erection in patients with psychogenic impotence. Further clinical results from controlled trials will probably explain if this new oral drug will compete with PGE1 or other agents in self-injection programs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H Hedlund, P Hedlund. 1996. Pharmacotherapy in erectile dysfunction agents for self-injection programs and alternative application models.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8908679/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Short history of erectile dysfunction treatment].

Since the origin, the man tried by all possible means to restor his erectile capacity. The obscurantism prevailed for a long time. We had to wait up to the turn of the 19th Century with Freud to get that things evolve a little bit. In the Fifties, the first penile prostheses were developed by Goodwin and Scott. In the Sixties, the behavioral therapies by Masters and Johnson. The Eighties represent the pharmacological revolution with the discovery of the effects of papaverin by Virag, then the E1 prostaglandin by Ishii, as well as the inhibitors of the 5 phospho di esterase (sildenafil, vardenafil, tadalafil) following studies on nitric oxide by Ignarro, Nobel Prize of medicine in 1998.

Erectile Dysfunction↗

Self-reported volume of radical prostatectomies among urologists in the USA.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the variability in the volume of radical retropubic prostatectomy (RP) performed by urologists in the USA, and the physician characteristics that predict RP volume, as previous studies showed that individual surgeon volume for RP is associated with clinical outcomes. METHODS: In a nationwide, representative survey of 2000 urologists who treat prostate carcinoma in the USA, we asked respondents to indicate a numerical range of RPs they perform each year (none, 1-10, 11-30, and >30, the last which we defined as 'high volume'). We then identified characteristics of the provider and practice associated with a high volume of RPs. Supplementing survey results with other national data, we estimated the proportion of all RPs in the USA performed by 'high-volume' urologists. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 66.1% (1313 urologists) with no differences between the respondents and non-respondents for the measured demographic variables. Among urologists who performed RPs (89.1% of the sample), 37.3% did < or = 10, 46.9% 11-30 and 15.8% >30 RPs/year. Academic and urological oncology fellowship-trained urologists were, respectively, 41% and 27% more likely than private-practice and non-fellowship-trained urologists to have a high volume of RPs. Of all RPs performed yearly in the USA, only an estimated 46.1% were by high-volume urologists. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of urologists report a RP volume that might be associated with higher rates of cardiac, respiratory, vascular, wound-healing, and genitourinary complications. Further study is needed to characterize the possible relationships between RP volume and tumour recurrence, survival, and long-term erectile dysfunction and incontinence.

Erectile Dysfunction↗