PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8912229

Analysis of stimulus-response chains using nonlinear dynamics.

Abstract

Stimulus chains represent those series of coupled biochemical events through which receptor occupation is transformed into physiological or pharmacological responses. These events are commonly modeled as sets of sequential hyperbolic responses that may be treated mathematically as an iterative process. Methods used in the analysis of iterated map functions such as bifurcation analysis and graphical iteration are applied to the stimulus sequence to understand the dynamics of the process. Examples are given to illustrate determination of fixed points of the map as well as techniques for determining their stability. When present, a central repelling fixed point reveals the existence and location of a stimulus threshold, while the upper attracting fixed point determines the size of the terminal stimulus (S omega) in the signaling pathway. Estimates of S omega are used to develop equations for predicting changes in agonist EC50S at each point in the stimulus chain. Similarly, Lyapunov exponents are found to provide a link between changes in cell or tissue parameters and changes in the rate of stimulus amplification and agonist maximal response. These findings demonstrate that techniques of nonlinear dynamics when combined with biochemical studies of cellular signaling, provide useful new approaches for quantitative and qualitative analysis of drug action.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J P Trzeciakowski. 1996. Analysis of stimulus-response chains using nonlinear dynamics.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1056-8719(96)00107-4

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Statistical methods for the Ames Salmonella assay: a review.

The Ames Salmonella assay remains the most widely used in vitro genotoxicity assay. Several statistical methods have been proposed for its analysis [B.H. Margolin, N. Kaplan, E. Zeiger, Statistical analysis of the Ames Salmonella/microsome test, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 78 (1981) 3779-3783; L.E. Myers, N.H. Saxton, L.I. Southerland, T.J. Wolff, Regression analysis of Ames test data, Environ. Mol. Mutagen., 3 (1981) 575-586; A.G. Stead, V. Hasselblad, J.P. Creason, L. Claxton, Modelling the Ames test, Mutation Res., 85 (1981) 13-27; L. Bernstein, J. Kaldor, J. McCaan, M.C. Pike, An empirical approach to the statistical analysis of mutagenesis data from the Salmonella test, Mutation Res., 97 (1982) 267-281; N.E. Breslow, Extra-Poisson variation in log-linear models, Appl. Stat., 33 (1984) 38-44; J. Wahrendorf, G.A.T. Mahon, M. Schumacher, A nonparametric approach to the statistical analysis of mutagenicity data, Mutation Res., 147 (1985) 5-13; D.G. Simpson, B.H. Margolin, Recursive nonparametric testing for dose-response relationships subject to downturns at high doses, Biometrika, 73 (1986) 589-596; D.G. Simpson, B.H. Margolin, Nonparametric testing for dose-response curves subject to downturns: Asymptotic power considerations, Annals Stat., 18 (1990) 373-390.]. In this paper we review recent literature to see what statistical methods are in fact employed for the analysis of the Ames assay. We then note that these methods can be classified into a common category in the framework of Haynes and Eckardt's mutation induction kinetics model [R.H. Haynes, F. Eckardt, Mathematical analysis of mutation induction kinetics, in: F.J. de Serres, A. Hollaender (Eds. ), Chemical Mutagens, Principles and Methods for Their Detection, Vol. 6, Plenum, New York, 1980, pp. 271-307]. The value in knowing this is that most methods of analysis considered here will likely exhibit common statistical behavior. These analyses are computationally intensive, e.g., [B.H. Margolin, N. Kaplan, E. Zeiger, Statistical analysis of the Ames Salmonella/microsome test, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 78 (1981) 3779-3783], hence the ready availability of computer programs is essential if biologists are to use these methods. We briefly review two statistical software programs that are available in the public domain, and describe in detail a third program, Salm, [B.H. Margolin, N. Kaplan, E. Zeiger, Statistical analysis of the Ames Salmonella/microsome test, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 78 (1981) 3779-3783; B.H. Margolin, B.S. Kim, K. Risko, The Ames Salmonella/microsome assay: Issues of inference and validation, J. Amer. Stat. Assoc., 84 (1989) 651-661]. The Salm program is obtainable through the file transfer protocol (ftp) or using a WWW browser. Finally, we discuss two statistical consequences of naively applying the two-fold rule, a method of analysis employed by a number of researchers.

Dose-Response Relationship, Drug

Plasmin, substilisin-like endoproteases, tissue plasminogen activator, and urokinase plasminogen activator are involved in activation of latent TGF-beta 1 in human seminal plasma.

We reported previously that TGF-beta 1 is a major immunosuppressive agent in human seminal plasma. TGF-beta 1 in seminal plasma is so abundant that it may represent the highest physiologic concentration of TGF-beta 1 reported for a biological fluid. The in vitro activation of TGF-beta 1 is detected at acidic pH. The acidic environment of the vagina is suggested as an in vivo physiological condition for the activation of seminal plasma latent TGF-beta 1. The present study demonstrates that Pefabloc [4-(2-aminoethyl)-benzenesulfonyl fluoride AEBSF]-inhibitable serine proteases are involved in the activation of latent TGF-beta 1. Pefabloc inhibits latent TGF-beta 1 activation in a dose- and time-dependent manner. The use of other protease inhibitors and specific antibodies reveals that, in addition to plasmin, substilisin-like endoproteases and tissue- and urokinase-type plasminogen activators participate in the activation of latent TGF-beta 1 in human seminal plasma.

Dose-Response Relationship, Drug

Interaction of nickel with UV-light in the induction of cytogenetic effects in human peripheral lymphocytes.

Chemical interaction is of major concern in the assessment of risk by regulatory agencies. In the present study, treatment of human lymphocytes with NiSO4 (1-100 microM) or UV-light (200, 1000 ergs/mm2) induced micronuclei (MN) in a dose-dependent fashion. Statistical analysis of the interaction factor (IF), showed that combined treatments of Ni(II) (1-100 microM) with UV-light (200, or 1000 ergs/mm2) interacted antagonistically for the induction of MN. Recently we reported that Ni(II) (0.5-10 microM) with UV-light (200 or 1000 ergs/mm2) or Cr(VI) or X-rays interacted antagonistically for the induction of sister chromatid exchanges (SCE), in peripheral human lymphocytes. These observations suggest that nickel present in complex mixtures may reduce the response, even in the presence of strong MN or SCE inducers, and may lead, therefore, to an underestimate of chemical exposure as assessed by these assays. Furthermore, metals affecting certain microsteps in the process of DNA replication or repair (e.g., histones, polymerases, ligases) may have similar antagonistic effects. Further studies are therefore recommended.

Dose-Response Relationship, Drug