PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8917777

The adjacent pixel nonlinearity: problems and solutions.

Abstract

The adjacent pixel nonlinearity refers to the dependence of the luminance of a given pixel on the preceding pixel or pixels. We measured this nonlinearity for two CRT displays by measuring the average luminances of a variety of test patterns with different luminance jumps. A two-stage model proposed by Mulligan and Stone was used to fit the data [Mulligan, J.B. & Stone, L. S., (1989). Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 6, 1217-1227 (1989)]. The results show that the model predicts our data well. Based on our measurements and the modeling results, a double-entry look-up table was created to compensate for this nonlinearity. This compensation method works even if the current pixel depends on more than one preceding pixel. Observers commented that at small pixel sizes the compensation results in a sharp, accurate image. Advantages and problems of this compensation will be discussed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S A Klein, Q J Hu, T Carney. 1996. The adjacent pixel nonlinearity: problems and solutions.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(96)00051-x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The influence of depicted illumination on brightness.

The striking illusions produced by simultaneous brightness contrast generally are attributed to the center-surround receptive field organization of lower order neurons in the primary visual pathway. Here we show that the apparent brightness of test objects can be either increased or decreased in a predictable manner depending on how light and shadow are portrayed in the scene. This evidence suggests that perceptions of brightness are generated empirically by experience with luminance relationships, an idea whose implications we pursue in the accompanying paper.

Computer Graphics

The application of volume deformation to three-dimensional facial reconstruction: a comparison with previous techniques.

Facial reconstruction has been widely criticised for its subjective nature and is thus often viewed as a last resort. Recent computer-aided reconstructions, which claim to be objective, may be subject to similar errors. To date, both manual reconstructions and computer-aided techniques have been limited to using the same tissue depth data reference tables. We propose that it is not solely the accuracy of the soft tissue depth data, but the sparsity of landmarks, which contributes to a lack of understanding of how soft tissue changes between the landmarks. The authors feel that a new approach to facial reconstruction using a computer graphics technique known as volume deformation addresses some of the problems encountered in the past. A review of previous methods is provided with discussion of the strengths and limitations of these techniques. In addition, areas are highlighted where the new deformation-based approach may offer possible solutions.

Computer Graphics