PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8919957

Health screening, development, and equity.

Abstract

Given the worldwide epidemiologic transition and the lure of technology aggressively promoted by those profiting from it, policy-makers in developing as well as industrialized countries now frequently face decisions on the introduction of screening into routine health services. Concerns regarding development and equity raise issues that may not arise within the scientific, technical, or individually-focused ethical frameworks used in prior work on screening policy. Screening can divert attention from primary prevention of a society's most important threats to health, especially when primary prevention faces political challenges and screening costs are viewed in isolation from the overall strategy required to make it useful. For secondary prevention of diseases with easily recognizable symptoms, public education promoting timely self-referral to accessible medical services is preferable to "screening" unselected populations. In any country, but perhaps especially in developing countries, screening may waste scarce resources: it could also lead to widened inequities.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P Braveman, E Tarimo. 1996. Health screening, development, and equity.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8919957/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed.

This review summarizes key factors that have interfered with translation of research to practice and what public health researchers can do to hasten such transfer, focusing on characteristics of interventions, target settings, and research designs. The need to address context and to utilize research, review, and reporting practices that address external validity issues-such as designs that focus on replication, and practical clinical and behavioral trials-are emphasized. Although there has been increased emphasis on social-ecological interventions that go beyond the individual level, interventions often address each component as if it were an independent intervention. Greater attention is needed to connectedness across program levels and components. Finally, examples are provided of evaluation models and current programs that can help accelerate translation of research to practice and policy.

Decision Making, Organizational↗