PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8927915

[Rectal prolapse].

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Numerous techniques have been developed in order to treat rectal procidentia, an uncommon pathology that is managed occasionally by the general surgeon. PURPOSE: This review article was performed in order to discuss the most recent changes in the pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of rectal procidentia. RESULTS: The pathophysiology and clinical characteristics of rectal procidentia are discussed. There are numerous alternatives for surgical treatment, but the most employed techniques include rectopexy with or without sigmoid resection. CONCLUSION: The better understanding of the physiopathology, the increasingly accurate evaluation of the anorectal function and its disorders, and the development of new biocompatible materials and finer techniques offer the patient the treatment that better suits to his or her particular problem.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Medina González. [Rectal prolapse].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8927915/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The effect of rectosigmoidectomy and Duhamel-type pull-through procedure on lower urinary tract function in children with Hirschsprung's disease.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of rectosigmoidectomy and Duhamel-type pull-through procedure on lower urinary tract function in children with Hirschsprungs disease. METHODS: During a 3-year period the authors assessed 11 consecutive children with Hirschsprung's disease prospectively by standard urodynamic investigations, before and after surgery. Urodynamics included simultaneous measurement of abdominal pressure, bladder pressure, detrusor pressure, and pelvic floor electromyography during filling and voiding. All children were submitted to laparoscopic resection of the aganglionic bowel segment below the cul de sac and a Duhamel-type pull-through procedure. Postoperatively, the children were assessed urodynamically and evaluated every 3 months for urologic problems. RESULTS: Mean age at first urodynamic study was 5 months (range, 2 to 10). Postoperative urodynamics were performed at a mean age of 10 months (range, 5 to 159). The mean interval between operation and postoperative urodynamic study was 6 months (range, 2 to 10). No child had structural urologic anomalies or urologic problems before surgery, and all had normal preoperative urodynamic findings. After surgery, urodynamics were considered normal in 3 children. In 7 children cystometric bladder capacity (CBC) was abnormally large, and 6 of these children had significant residuals. However, all had detrusor contractility and were able to void spontaneously. One child had low bladder compliance postoperatively. Despite the urodynamic changes, no child had clinical urologic problems at further follow-up. Mean follow-up after surgery was 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that after rectosigmoidectomy below the cul de sac alterations of bladder function can be observed. In 7 of the 11 patients studied, mean cystometric bladder capacity was 87% higher than capacity estimated for age. Moreover, postoperative residuals were 156% higher than the preoperative values. These findings suggest that partial detrusor denervation is likely in these patients. However, because detrusor contractility was present, and none of the children had retention or any urologic problems, the findings must be interpreted carefully. Because children with Hirschsprung's disease generally do not have preexisting urologic problems, routine preoperative urodynamic screening is not necessary. However, children with voiding problems after operation should be investigated urodynamically. For legal reasons parents should be informed of possible urologic problems, especially if subtotal resection of the aganglionic bowel segment is planned.

Colon, Sigmoid↗

Modified retrolabyrinthine approach with partial labyrinthectomy: anatomic study.

This study was undertaken to evaluate the feasability of the modified retrolabyrinthine approach (traditional retrolabyrinthine approach plus resection of the posterior semicircular canal) to expose the entire fundus of the internal auditory canal (IAC). This approach is advocated by its proponents to manage acoustic neuromas reaching the lateral IAC and with the preservation of hearing as the goal. Little anatomic data directly estimate the limitations of this exposure. Measurements were recorded from 25 cadaver temporal bones dissected with this modified approach. The distances were taken between the porus acousticus (inferior and superior portions), the dome of the jugular bulb, the midportion of the sigmoid sinus, and the fundus of the IAC (inferior and superior portions). All of the measurements were then compared with those of the translabyrithine approach. The current study shows that despite the sacrifice of the posterior semicircular canal, the superior lateral fundus cannot be completely visualized. There is a distance (on average 1.1 mm) that differentiates the superior area of the IAC accessible with translabyrithine and modified retrosigmoid techniques. This value is smaller than that observed in the classic retrosigmoid approach indicating that the modified technique affords a more adequate, even if not ideal, exposure to minimize the risk of recurrence. The modified retrolabyrinthine approach provided an optimal exposure of the inferior half of the IAC. A superior blind area, smaller than that of the traditional retrolabyrinthine technique, cannot be completely approached via this route. We believe that this approach can be considered as an alternative technique in selected cases especially for tumors involving the inferior vestibular nerve.

Colon, Sigmoid↗