PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8931140

Relationship between protein structure and geometrical constraints.

Abstract

We evaluate to what extent the structure of proteins can be deduced from incomplete knowledge of disulfide bridges, surface assignments, secondary structure assignments, and additional distance constraints. A cost function taking such constraints into account was used to obtain protein structures using a simple minimization algorithm. For small proteins, the approximate structure could be obtained using one additional distance constraint for each amino acid in the protein. We also studied the effect of using predicted secondary structure and surface assignments. The constraints used in this approach typically may be obtained from low-resolution experimental data. When using a cost function based on distances, half of the resulting structures will be mirrored, because the resulting structure and its mirror image will have the same cost. The secondary structure assignments were therefore divided into chirality constraints and distance constraints. Here we report that the problem of mirrored structures, in some cases, can be solved by using a chirality term in the cost function.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

O Lund, J Hansen, S Brunak, J Bohr. 1996. Relationship between protein structure and geometrical constraints.. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.5560051108

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Bend to open?

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Protein Structure, Secondary↗

Packing helices in proteins by global optimization of a potential energy function.

An efficient method has been developed for packing alpha-helices in proteins. It treats alpha-helices as rigid bodies and uses a simplified Lennard-Jones potential with Miyazawa-Jernigan contact-energy parameters to describe the interactions between the alpha-helical elements in this coarse-grained system. Global conformational searches to generate packing arrangements rapidly are carried out with a Monte Carlo-with-minimization type of approach. The results for 42 proteins show that the approach reproduces native-like folds of alpha-helical proteins as low-energy local minima of this highly simplified potential function.

Protein Structure, Secondary↗

Multiple structural alignment for distantly related all beta structures using TOPS pattern discovery and simulated annealing.

Topsalign is a method that will structurally align diverse protein structures, for example, structural alignment of protein superfolds. All proteins within a superfold share the same fold but often have very low sequence identity and different biological and biochemical functions. There is often significant structural diversity around the common scaffold of secondary structure elements of the fold. Topsalign uses topological descriptions of proteins. A pattern discovery algorithm identifies equivalent secondary structure elements between a set of proteins and these are used to produce an initial multiple structure alignment. Simulated annealing is used to optimize the alignment. The output of Topsalign is a multiple structure-based sequence alignment and a 3D superposition of the structures. This method has been tested on three superfolds: the beta jelly roll, TIM (alpha/beta) barrel and the OB fold. Topsalign outperforms established methods on very diverse structures. Despite the pattern discovery working only on beta strand secondary structure elements, Topsalign is shown to align TIM (alpha/beta) barrel superfamilies, which contain both alpha helices and beta strands.

Protein Structure, Secondary↗