PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8936879

Least restrictive alternatives: do they really work?

I Richmond·D Trujillo·J Schmelzer·S Phillips·D Davis
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Seclusion and restraint continue to spark debate regarding their therapeutic value and ethical, legal, and humanitarian implications, yet they remain frequently used forms of treatment in psychiatric settings. Identifying specific alternatives to seclusion and restraint use, teaching nursing staff how and when to use them, and determining their effect on patient outcome are important quality improvement issues. A quality improvement study conducted at a long-term care psychiatric facility identified alternatives that nursing staff used and their effect on reducing seclusion and restraint rates. A total of 773 incidents of disruptive behavior were managed with least restrictive alternatives and did not require the use of seclusion or restraint. One-to-one verbal intervention followed by medication as needed represented the most frequently used alternative. Total seclusion and restraint hours decreased by 31 percent, and restraint hours decreased by 47 percent.

Explore related subjects

ColoradoHospitals, PsychiatricHospitals, VeteransHumansNursing CareNursing StaffPatient AdvocacyQuality Assurance, Health CareRestraint, PhysicalJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

I Richmond, D Trujillo, J Schmelzer, S Phillips, D Davis. 1996. Least restrictive alternatives: do they really work?. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001786-199610000-00010

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

A large specific deterrent effect of arrest for patronizing a prostitute.

BACKGROUND: Prior research suggests that arrest, compared with no police detection, of some types of offenders does not decrease the chances they will reoffend. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We assessed the specific deterrent effect of arrest for patronizing a street prostitute in Colorado Springs by comparing the incidence of arrest for clients of prostitutes first detected through public health surveillance with the incidence of rearrest for clients first detected by police arrest. Although these sets of clients were demographically and behaviorally similar, arrest reduced the likelihood of a subsequent arrest by approximately 70%. In other areas of the United States, arrest did not appear to displace a client's patronizing. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our results suggest that apprehending clients decreases their patronizing behavior substantially.

Colorado↗
PubMed2006

Antibiotic resistance genes as emerging contaminants: studies in northern Colorado.

This study explores antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) as emerging environmental contaminants. The purpose of this study was to investigate the occurrence of ARGs in various environmental compartments in northern Colorado, including Cache La Poudre (Poudre) River sediments, irrigation ditches, dairy lagoons, and the effluents of wastewater recycling and drinking water treatment plants. Additionally, ARG concentrations in the Poudre River sediments were analyzed at three time points at five sites with varying levels of urban/agricultural impact and compared with two previously published time points. It was expected that ARG concentrations would be significantly higher in environments directly impacted by urban/agricultural activity than in pristine and lesser-impacted environments. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection assays were applied to detect the presence/absence of several tetracycline and sulfonamide ARGs. Quantitative real-time PCR was used to further quantify two tetracycline ARGs (tet(W) and tet(O)) and two sulfonamide ARGs (sul(I) and sul(II)). The following trend was observed with respect to ARG concentrations (normalized to eubacterial 16S rRNA genes): dairy lagoon water > irrigation ditch water > urban/agriculturally impacted river sediments (p < 0.0001), except for sul(II), which was absent in ditch water. It was noted that tet(W) and tet(O) were also present in treated drinking water and recycled wastewater, suggesting that these are potential pathways for the spread of ARGs to and from humans. On the basis of this study, there is a need for environmental scientists and engineers to help address the issue of the spread of ARGs in the environment.

Colorado↗