PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8936882

Staff surveys: setting the stage for work restructuring.

Abstract

Work restructuring is an intensive, time-consuming undertaking that succeeds when proper planning and a disciplined process promote open lines of communication between administration and staff. Surveying staff members to understand their values and how they are spending their time sets the stage for work restructuring. The data collected identify opportunities for change to improve care and increase staff satisfaction and become a baseline for benchmarking success. Surveys also identify what staff members value, what they want to retain from the current system, what needs to be better integrated with other departments, what activities can be eliminated, and any changes that already have positively affected care delivery.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C H Smeltzer, N M Formella. 1996. Staff surveys: setting the stage for work restructuring.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001786-199610000-00013

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Information-sharing among couples considering multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the information-sharing strategies of couples considering fetal reduction, and the impact of these strategies on the chances of encountering hostility in their social networks. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design of semistructured qualitative interviews, coded with respect to sharing strategies and level of personally directed hostility encountered. SETTING: Multiple Pregnancy Management Program, Comprehensive Genetics, New York, New York. PATIENT(S) AND INTERVENTION(S): Fifty women and their partners who were making a first visit to our maternal-fetal management facility, in order to consider the possibility of multifetal reduction as a pregnancy-management strategy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of information-sharing strategies, and the chances of encountering personally directed hostility regarding multifetal reduction associated with more and less selective strategies. RESULT(S): Four information-sharing strategies emerged from the analysis. Two of these strategies were relatively open (extended network, and both parents). Two other strategies were relatively selective (qualified family and friends, and defended relationship). The selective strategies were significantly less likely to encounter to encounter personally directed hostility (odds ratio, 3.88; 95% confidence intervals, 0.87-17.30). CONCLUSION(S): Selective sharing of information for couples considering multifetal prgnancy reduction is a potentially useful strategy for moderating potentially stressful relationships in their social networks. Clinics should find a way of integrating the discussion of selective sharing into their clinic's cultural repertoire of patient-support services.

Communication↗