PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8938006

Shadows and depth illusions.

Abstract

The visual system uses shadows to compute perceived depth of features on an uneven surface, and in doing so makes the assumption of a single light source in most circumstances. Three illusory depth effects are described (depth reversal, accentuation, and flattening) that can be demonstrated with 3-D materials, and all of which are based on the single-source assumption. Ambiguous lighting conditions may produce moment-to-moment depth reversals and/or the subjective sensation of textural 'strangeness'. It is suggested that these are both subjective experiences which occur when the system cannot compute depth with certainty.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R C Morris. 1996. Shadows and depth illusions.. https://doi.org/10.1068/p250927

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The rapid use of gender information: evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eyetracking.

Eye movements of listeners were monitored to investigate how gender information and accessibility influence the initial processes of pronoun interpretation. Previous studies on this issue have produced mixed results, and several studies have concluded that gender cues are not automatically used during the early processes of pronoun interpretation (e.g. Garnham, A., Oakhill, J. & Cruttenden, H. (1992). The role of implicit causality and gender cue in the interpretation of pronouns. Language and Cognitive Processes, 73 (4), 231-255; Greene, S. B., McKoon, G. & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Pronoun resolution and discourse models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 182, 266-283). In the two experiments presented here, participants viewed a picture with two familiar cartoon characters of either same or different gender. They listened to a text describing the picture, in which a pronoun referred to either the first, more accessible, character, or the second. (For example, Donald is bringing some mail to ¿Mickey/Minnie¿ while a violent storm is beginning. He's carrying an umbrellaellipsis.) The results of both experiments show rapid use of both gender and accessibility at approximately 200 ms after the pronoun offset.

Cues↗

Vestibular, visual, and somatosensory contributions to human control of upright stance.

We investigated the changes of human posture control of upright stance which occur when vestibular cues (VEST) are absent and visual and somatosensory orientation cues (VIS, SOM) are removed. Postural responses to sinusoidal tilts of a motion platform in the sagittal plane (+/-2 degrees, f=0.05, 0.1, 0.2 and 0.4 Hz) were studied in normal subjects (Ns) and patients with bilateral vestibular loss (Ps). We found that absence of VEST (Ps, visual reference) and removal of VIS (Ns, no visual reference) had little effect on stabilization of upright body posture in space. In the absence of both VEST and VIS (Ps, no visual reference) somatosensory graviception still provided some information on body orientation in space at 0.05 and 0.1 Hz. However, at the higher frequencies Ps qualitatively changed their behavior; they then tended to actively align their bodies with respect to the motion platform. The findings confirm predictions of a novel postural control model.

Cues↗

A Fraser illusion without local cues?

In the well-known Fraser illusion, a line composed of tilted elements itself appears tilted. The standard explanation of this illusion has been that the global orientation of the line is in some way influenced by the local orientation of the elements. The illusion was recreated using a texture composed of collinear Gabor stimuli, which were vertical. There was no local tilt. The illusory tilt was produced by gradually shifting the phase of the successive Gabors along each line. Although the 2D Fourier transform of this global pattern peaks at off-vertical orientations, the local energy of the patches is predominantly vertical. How does the visual system nevertheless pick up this global information? This can be explained by elongated linear filters, or a phase-tuned second-stage mechanism. We examined the first theory using a stereoscopic demonstration. When lines of opposite tilt are presented in the two eyes, they combine binocularly to produce stereoscopic slant. We tested whether the illusory tilts in the phase-shifted Gabors texture give stereoscopic slant, when opposite tilts are presented to the two eyes. They do not. Instead, stereoscopic depth is dominated by the local phase-disparity of the individual patches. This indicates that the illusion is not present at the stage of linear filters, which are input to stereo, but must involve second-stage interactions or collators.

Cues↗