PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8945790

Bias effects in implicit memory tasks.

Abstract

A major focus of recent research in memory has been performance on implicit tasks. The phenomenon of most interest has been repetition priming, the effect that prior exposure to a stimulus has on later perception of the stimulus or on a later decision about the stimulus. Picture naming, word identification, and word production in stem- and fragment-completion tasks all show repetition priming effects. The separation of implicit from explicit memory systems provides one account of this data, but a different theoretical view is proposed here: Repetition-priming effects come about because the processes that perform a task are biased products, temporary modifications of the processes, which influence later processing. The aim of this article is to demonstrate the potential of this view for developing new theories and for prompting new empirical questions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Ratcliff, G McKoon. 1996. Bias effects in implicit memory tasks.. https://doi.org/10.1037/%2F0096-3445.125.4.403

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Automatic alerting does not speed late motoric processes in a reaction-time task.

When an irrelevant 'accessory' stimulus is presented at about the same time as the imperative signal in a choice reaction time-task, the latency of the voluntary response is markedly reduced. The most prominent cognitive theories agree that this effect is attributable to a brief surge in arousal ('automatic alerting'), but they disagree over whether the facilitation is localized to a late, low-level motoric process or to an earlier stage, the process of orienting to and then perceptually categorizing the reaction stimulus. To test these alternative hypotheses, we used the onset of the lateralized readiness potential (a movement-related brain potential) as a temporal landmark to partition mean reaction time into two time segments. The first segment included the time required to perceive the visual stimulus and decide which hand to react with; the second included only motoric processes. Presentation of an irrelevant acoustic stimulus shortened the first interval but had no effect on the second. We therefore rejected the motoric hypothesis.

Auditory Perception

Relationships among multiple task asymmetries. I. A critical review.

Previous multiple-task experiments examining relationships among lateral difference measures have been interpreted as supporting (a) both global and local relationships or (b) local relationships only. The evidence from principle components, correlational, and factor analytic approaches is reviewed with the aim of reconciling the literature. Although a principle component has been reported to which all asymmetries correlate positively, it may not reflect existing null and negative correlations between pairs of measures. All three literatures make clear that such correlations exist, calling into question the reality of a global relationship. In contrast, all three approaches find evidence supporting the reality of local relationships. Factor analytic approaches most fully develop local relationships and permit interpretation in terms of hemispheric processes, but they need to (a) use larger sample sizes, (b) prescreen measures for reliability, and (c) make publicly available the underlying correlational matrices.

Auditory Perception