PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8947709

Taking the problem oriented medical record forward.

Abstract

The problem oriented medical record (POMR) has proved to be very successful in providing a structure that helps doctors record their notes about patients, and view those notes subsequently in a manner that quickly gives them a good understanding of that patients history. This approach has been validated by the American Institute of Medicine. With the increased use of computer systems that implement the POMR by doctors, the limitations of this structure have become apparent, and there is clearly scope for developing the model further to improve the quality of the data recorded, and adding meaning to it. This paper describes some of the limitations of the POMR, and discusses a number of areas in which it may be extended. Crucially, this is done in a manner which is both implementable, and usable. The extensions explored include some types of entity including encounters, episodes and subproblems; and an alternative view-the Timeline. The terminology used for the extensions is clarified. Mechanisms by which these extensions have been implemented are described. Ways in which systems can manage these extensions automatically are suggested. Such implementations are constrained by the need not to allow the demands of the computer to intrude into the patient encounter. They are also constrained by the requirements for reporting by professional and governmental institutions, and by what is pragmatically feasible in software and hardware.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P Salmon, A Rappaport, M Bainbridge, G Hayes, J Williams. 1996. Taking the problem oriented medical record forward.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8947709/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Does the computerized display of charges affect inpatient ancillary test utilization?

BACKGROUND: The computerized display of charges for ancillary tests in outpatients has been found to affect physician-ordering behavior, but this issue has not been studied in inpatients. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the computerized display of charges for clinical laboratory or radiological tests affected physician-ordering behavior. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two prospective controlled trials, randomized by patient, were performed. Each trial included all medical and surgical inpatients at 1 large teaching hospital during 4 and 7 months: 3536 intervention and 3554 control inpatients in the group with clinical laboratory tests, and 8728 intervention and 8653 control inpatients in the group with radiological tests. The intervention consisted of the computerized display of charges for tests at the time of ordering. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The number of clinical laboratory and radiological tests ordered per admission and the charges for these tests. RESULTS: For the clinical laboratory tests, during a 4-month study period, patients in the intervention group had 4.5% fewer tests ordered, and the total charges for these tests were 4.2% lower, although neither difference was statistically significant. Compared with historical controls from the same 4-month period a year before, the charges for the tests per admission had decreased 13.3%, but the decrease was temporally correlated with a restriction of future ordering of tests, and not with the introduction of the display of charges. For the radiological tests, during a 7-month period, the intervention group had almost identical numbers of tests ordered and charges for these tests. CONCLUSIONS: The computerized display of charges had no statistically significant effect on the number of clinical laboratory tests or radiological procedures ordered or performed, although small trends were present for clinical laboratory tests. More intensive interventions may be needed to affect physician test utilization.

Computer Systems

[EDP registration of the types of tests, working procedures and diagnosis in a department of histopathology. Minimum dataset for assessment of the workload].

The aim of the study was to develop a computer-based system for measuring workload in a department of histo- and cytopathology using routine registration of a minimum dataset. A group with representatives from the laboratory technicians, the pathologists and the secretaries defined 18 types of specimens. By studying each step of specimen processing it was shown, that 14 items for technical details could cover all the work done in the department. This information was collected in a computer-based system connected to the hospital network. The measurement of workload is essential for the efficient management of laboratory services. The registration of specimen types and a minimum dataset for specimen processing describes the work done in a department of histo- and cytopathology.

Computer Systems