PubMed · 8949052
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
A Montésinos. [Operating suite. Hierarchic relationships].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8949052/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
This work examines the moderating effects of status stability, legitimacy, and group permeability on in-group bias among high- and low-status groups. These effects were examined separately for evaluative measures that were relevant as well as irrelevant to the salient status distinctions. The results support social identity theory and show that high-status groups are more biased. The meta-analysis reveals that perceived status stability, legitimacy, and permeability moderate the effects of group status. Also, these variables interacted in their influences on the effect of group status on in-group bias, but this was only true for irrelevant evaluative dimensions. When status was unstable and perceived as illegitimate, low-status groups and high-status groups were equally biased when group boundaries were impermeable, compared with when they were permeable. Implications for social identity theory as well as for intergroup attitudes are discussed.
The term of "aristocracy" has always risen various questions, such as its real meaning, its role, its types, its purposes, who composes aristocracy, etc. In this text, I have tried to give my point of view to those questions, not only in a historical and traditional line of development, but also applied to present systems, relations and sets of values. I have differentiated two types of aristocracy, so called "aristocracy of soul" and "aristocracy of property" and decsribed main features. Furthermore, there is a view to traditional role of aristocracy, its principles and laws of existence, together with its dangers. Based on those categories, further direction of development leads to the questions of aristocracy in democratic societies with all the contemporary "specificum". The last part deals with the matter of aristocracy in regard to politics and its wide range of application.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.