PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8953870

[Examples of pitfalls in statistical analysis--3: Why do we need to use multiple comparison procedures?].

Abstract

When comparing the means of more than three groups, we first have to carry out an analysis of variance (ANOVA) to confirm whether all of the means of each group are equal, and we then have to evaluate all possible pairwise comparisons with multiple comparison procedures. If we use only the unpaired t-test for all pairwise comparisons without ANOVA and multiple comparison procedures, we are more likely not only to erroneously conclude that two means in a pair are significantly different when actually they are not, but also to create a contradiction between pairs of means with large differences which are not considered significant, and pairs of means with small differences which are considered significant. In this article, I discuss two problems in comparing the means of multiple groups by presenting an example in which I apply unpaired t-test on data that should be analyzed by ANOVA and multiple comparison procedures.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

O Nagata. 1996. [Examples of pitfalls in statistical analysis--3: Why do we need to use multiple comparison procedures?].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8953870/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Molecular heterochrony and the evolution of sociality in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris).

Sibling care is a hallmark of social insects, but its evolution remains challenging to explain at the molecular level. The hypothesis that sibling care evolved from ancestral maternal care in primitively eusocial insects has been elaborated to involve heterochronic changes in gene expression. This elaboration leads to the prediction that workers in these species will show patterns of gene expression more similar to foundress queens, who express maternal care behaviour, than to established queens engaged solely in reproductive behaviour. We tested this idea in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) using a microarray platform with approximately 4500 genes. Unlike the wasp Polistes metricus, in which support for the above prediction has been obtained, we found that patterns of brain gene expression in foundress and queen bumblebees were more similar to each other than to workers. Comparisons of differentially expressed genes derived from this study and gene lists from microarray studies in Polistes and the honeybee Apis mellifera yielded a shared set of genes involved in the regulation of related social behaviours across independent eusocial lineages. Together, these results suggest that multiple independent evolutions of eusociality in the insects might have involved different evolutionary routes, but nevertheless involved some similarities at the molecular level.

Analysis of Variance↗

Confidence intervals for the standardized effect arising in the comparison of two normal populations.

Confidence intervals for a standardized effect are derived after stabilizing the variance of the Welch t-statistic. Simulation studies demonstrate the viability of the resulting intervals for a wide range of parameter values and sample sizes as small as five. The methodology is extended to the combination of results from several studies, so as to obtain a confidence interval for a representative standardized effect for all the studies. The methods are illustrated on a recent meta-analytic study of systolic blood pressure reduction during a weight reducing regime, as well as the classical Mumford data on psychological intervention and hospital length of stay.

Analysis of Variance↗