[Using natural helping systems].

B Voges

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8963098

[Using natural helping systems].

B Voges

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Professional psychiatric help alone is not sufficient especially in the treatment of chronic mental illness. One must offer additional support also known as social support or social network. Informal helpers are family members, friends, civilian helpers, self-help groups with contracts to media and political levels and so on. In spite of different aims they have a great deal in common such as free-of-charge help, assistance to professional helpers not as their substitutes, and being in touch with normal everyday life. Any tensions between professional and informal helpers should be relieved in a constructive manner. Support by informal carers must also be assessed although it is difficult to find the correct approach, since so many variables are involved. The significance of promoting a social network for mental health becomes particularly evident in view of the reduction of the social network in persons suffering from schizophrenia.

Explore related subjects

Caregivers Chronic Disease Combined Modality Therapy Humans Mental Disorders Patient Care Team Social Environment Social Support English Abstract Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

B Voges. 1996. [Using natural helping systems].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8963098/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2025

Caregiver experiences after the death of a person with dementia with Lewy bodies: A mixed-methods analysis.

BackgroundDementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is a common degenerative dementia, but no studies investigate bereaved caregiver experiences.ObjectiveTo investigate the experiences of caregivers three months after the death of persons with DLB using a mixed-methods approach.MethodsDyads of individuals with moderate-advanced DLB and their primary informal caregivers were followed prospectively every 6 months until the person with DLB died. Caregivers completed a study visit with questionnaires and a semi-structured interview ∼3 months later. Spearman correlation coefficients and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests evaluated the relationships of post-death measures with pre-death patient and caregiver variables. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the interviews.ResultsSeventy-three caregivers completed visits (mean 3.5 months post-death). Most of the caregivers were women (82.2%) and spouses (76.7%) or adult children (17.8%). Over 40% had scores indicating risk for clinical depression. Post-death caregiver experiences (depression, quality of life, grief, resilience) correlated with pre-death caregiver experiences. Post-death experiences did not associate with patient characteristics, disease-related symptoms, or healthcare services used in the last 6 months of life. Trajectories for caregiver measures from pre- to post-death visits varied widely. Interview themes included grief and sadness, anger, guilt and regret, relief, appreciation/gratitude, and adjusting to a new normal.ConclusionsThe finding that pre-death caregiving experiences have the strongest association with post-death experiences emphasizes the critical importance of accessible and evidence-based caregiver support before and after the death of a person with DLB. Research is needed to develop interventions for current and bereaved caregivers of individuals with DLB.Trial registration informationNCT04829656 (submitted 2021-03-22).

Caregivers↗

PubMed1999

The trouble with families: toward an ethic of accommodation.

Although some clinicians are extraordinarily sensitive to the legitimate roles of patients' families in medical crises, a persistent tendency to equate families with trouble is evident in both the literature and the practice of medicine. Some negative presumptions about families derive from western medicine's almost exclusive focus on the individual patient in codes of ethics, training, and practice. Modern bioethics has reinforced this individualistic approach. Physicians' primary responsibilities are unequivocally to their patients, but a complete understanding of the patient's personhood must include consideration of the significant persons who help define the patient's core identity. One source of tension between professionals and families lies in differing perceptions of the roles that family members should play and how they should play them. Members of a family may act as advocates, provide or manage care, serve as trusted companions on the journey through illness and death, and make decisions on behalf of an incompetent patient. Each role presents potential conflicts. Other sources of conflict include disagreement within a family; challenges to physician authority; fear of litigation; and differing religious, ethnic, or cultural traditions. An ethic of accommodation emphasizes the need to negotiate care plans that do not compromise patients' basic interests but that recognize the capacities and limitations of family members. Family caregivers want understandable and timely information, better training, compassionate recognition of their anxiety, guidance in defining their roles and responsibilities, and support for the setting of fair limits on their sacrifices. Health care professionals can better meet these needs through education and skills acquisition, the establishment of partnerships with families, and regular dialogue and communication.

Caregivers↗

PubMed1999

The effects of respite care on informal carers' well-being: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: The provision of respite care is a common method employed to reduce the burden on those who care for individuals with a chronic illness or disability. The aim of the present review was to examine research on respite provision with a view to establishing what effect it has on carers. METHOD: A literature search was conducted for studies examining the effect of respite provision on carers, 'Psyclit', 'Medline' and Social Science Citation Index computerized databases were utilized, followed by a search of the reference sections of relevant studies. RESULTS: The search yielded 29 studies, from which there was little evidence that respite intervention has either a consistent or enduring beneficial effect on carers' well-being. This may be due in part to the fact that the majority of the work conducted has been methodologically poor. Also significant, however, might be that the findings suggest respite care often fails to facilitate the maintenance of socially supportive relationships, which may moderate strain after respite has ended. CONCLUSIONS: A more 'carer-centred' approach is required in both the provision and evaluation of respite care intervention. This approach would address the experiences of both caregiver and care-recipient during the respite period.

Caregivers↗