PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8964924

The case against mandatory continuing education.

Abstract

Requiring continuing education (CE) for RN relicensure began in the 1970s and has remained a controversial issue over the past 25 years. This article is a description of the process used by nurses in one state to investigate the complex issues surrounding mandatory continuing education for relicensure and the factors that led state nursing leaders to support the continuation of a voluntary CE system. Included are the findings of a survey of all states currently requiring continuing education for relicensure. The primary reason given for mandating CE was to protect the public, however, no data are available to support this premise.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P O Hewlett, L W Eichelberger. The case against mandatory continuing education.. https://doi.org/10.3928/0022-0124-19960701-07

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Hospitals' responses to nurse staffing shortages.

Hospitals have used a mix of short-term and long-term strategies to deal with nurse shortages, particularly efforts emphasizing nurse education, competitive compensation, and temporary staff. Interviews with health care leaders from Round Five of the Community Tracking Study indicate that these activities, in conjunction with other factors, have assisted in reducing shortages of hospital nurses. However, hospitals' actions have increased costs and raised concerns about their potential impact on patient care. Additionally, a large degree of doubt exists among hospitals about their ability to meet future nursing needs.

Education, Nursing, Continuing↗