PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8974527

Offenders who have a learning disability.

Abstract

This article examines aspects of the criminal justice system in relation to offenders with learning disabilities. Questions relating to the vulnerability and responsibility of suspects are explored in the light of recent literature. The legal rights of detainees are considered with reference to the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984. The role of the 'appropriate adult' is reviewed and implications for service workers are explored. Future directions are considered with reference to innovative developments in services. Victims and witnesses will be considered in a subsequent article.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S McNally. Offenders who have a learning disability.. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.1996.5.13.805

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Justice and equality in mental health law: the European experience.

This is the text of a lecture delivered at the World Conference of the International Academy of Law and Mental Health in Sydney in September 2003 on the occasion of the award to the author of the Prix Philippe Pinel. Its theme is the potential of the European Convention on Human Rights to secure the human rights of people with mental disorders and disabilities, viewed in the context of the legislation on mental health and mental incapacity in England and Wales. Its conclusion is that the Convention is better at protecting them from unwanted or unnecessary treatment and care than it is at securing for them equal access to the treatment and care they want or need. The lecture has been updated to reflect developments in the United Kingdom since 2003.

Civil Rights↗

["For the welfare of patients"--is this really the case?].

According to a decision by the German Federal Constitution Court (1 BvR 347/98), it is illegal to refuse compulsorily insured persons therapy if they suffering from a lifethreatening disease against which there is no effective therapy on the basis of current medical science. The chosen method of treatment should offer a not entirely remote chance of healing. What counts is the effect treatment has in each individual case. Serious objections to the the Court's criteria have been expressed by medical and legal experts, who contend that the Court has disregarded patients' protection against unknown risks and "quackery" as well as the incalculable financial effects on the community of insureds.

Civil Rights↗