PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8976944

A new method for evaluating small intestinal motility using duplex Doppler sonography.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Many techniques currently used to study motility of the small intestine are too complex for large-scale use; other techniques provide information that is nonspecific and nonquantitative. The aim of the present study was to verify whether intestinal peristalsis can be seen and quantitatively assessed by means of duplex Doppler sonography. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We prospectively studied 152 normal fasting subjects using sonography, duplex Doppler sonography, and stethoscopic auscultation or phonocardiographic registration of bowel sounds in three abdominal sites. In each subject, we positioned the sample volume near the intestinal wall and then recorded Doppler signals of different amplitude and duration that related to bowel motility. Studies were repeated after ingestion of water (n = 55) and after a standard test meal (n = 73). The number of peristaltic waves and the number of bowel sounds revealed by the different imaging techniques were compared and statistically evaluated by Student's t test. RESULTS: Intestinal movements were classified as peristaltic or nonperistaltic (mixing movements) based on amplitude and duration of Doppler signals. The mean number of peristaltic waves revealed by Doppler sonography was three per minute in fasting subjects, with no significant increase after ingestion of water (3.78 per min) or the test meal (3.92 per min). The mean number of bowel sounds obtained with auscultation and phonocardiographic recordings was significantly higher in fasting subjects (8.7 per min) and after ingestion of water (9.55 per min) or the test meal (12 per min). CONCLUSION: Intestinal contractions produce Doppler signals of different amplitudes and duration, thus potentially allowing differentiation between peristaltic and nonperistaltic movements. This differentiation is not possible with auscultation or phonocardiographic registration because similar bowel sounds are produced by nonprogressive, mixing movements as well as by true peristaltic movements. Duplex Doppler sonography allows graphic visualization of intestinal movements that can be subjected to qualitative and quantitative analysis and may be suitable for the noninvasive study of small-bowel motility.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P Gimondo, P Mirk. 1997. A new method for evaluating small intestinal motility using duplex Doppler sonography.. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.168.1.8976944

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[A new medical education using a lung sound auscultation simulator called "Mr. Lung"].

We developed a lung sound auscultation simulator "Mr. Lung" in 2001. To improve the auscultation skills of lung sounds, we utilized this new device in our educational training facility. From June 2001 to March 2002, we used "Mr. Lung" for our small group training in which one hundred of the fifth year medical students were divided into small groups from which one group was taught every other week. The class consisted of ninety-minute training periods for auscultation of lung sounds. At first, we explained the classification of lung sounds, and then auscultation tests were performed. Namely, students listened to three cases of abnormal or adventitious lung sounds on "Mr. Lung" through their stethoscopes. Next they answered questions corresponding to the portion and quality of the sounds. Then, we explained the correct answers and how to differentiate lung sounds on "Mr. Lung". Additionally, at the beginning and the end of the lecture, five degrees of self-assessment for the auscultation of the lung sounds were performed. The ratio of correct answers for lung sounds were 36.9% for differences between bilateral lung sounds, 52.5% for coarse crackles, 34.1% for fine crackles, 69.2% for wheezes, 62.1% for rhonchi and 22.2% for stridor. Self-assessment scores were significantly higher after the class than before. The ratio of correct lung sound answers was surprisingly low among medical students. We believe repetitive auscultation of the simulator to be extremely helpful for medical education.

Auscultation↗