PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8985528

Clinical problems in measles case management.

Abstract

Measles remains one of the leading causes of childhood morbidity and mortality in developing countries. The World Health Organization has identified effective case management as one of the specific strategies to reduce the burden of this disease. The purpose of this article is to review the aetiology, natural history, treatment and outcome of the common clinical problems associated with measles with a view to identifying possible deficiencies in case management. Complications such as pneumonia, diarrhoea, croup and malnutrition have been well defined in terms of their relative contribution to morbidity and mortality. However, there are few published data on the aetiology and natural history of these specific complications. Such data are crucial for rational case management strategies. Data on treatment of measles and its complications are limited and the role of antibiotic prophylaxis and therapy is unclear. The only specific research focus on case management during the last decade has been vitamin A therapy. There is a continuing need for community and hospital-based studies on the natural history of measles and its complications, the aetiology of these complications and intervention strategies that will improve measles case management.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G D Hussey, C J Clements. 1996. Clinical problems in measles case management.. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724936.1996.11747843

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Costs of surgeries in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic literature review.

BACKGROUND: Surgical care is essential for achieving global health equity, yet low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) face major gaps in access and planning, partly due to limited evidence on the costs and resource requirements of surgical interventions. Understanding these costs is vital for designing efficient and equitable health systems. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review (covering MEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health, EconLit and grey literature) to identify studies reporting the costs of surgeries in LMICs from January 2000 to June 2023. Minor and major surgical procedures were considered, focusing on therapeutic procedures (excluding diagnostic interventions). Studies that clearly identified, quantified and costed hospital resources and services deployed in the provision of surgical care, and included at least two of the surgical production factors (ie, consumables, diagnostics, personnel, infrastructure and overhead) in the costing were included. Costs were standardised to 2023 International dollars (I$) for comparability. RESULTS: A total of 74 studies from 29 countries met the inclusion criteria, with 210 cost estimates across 65 procedure groups. Costs varied widely: from I$1.54 for a caesarean section in Tanzania to I$618 098 for paediatric cataract surgery in Zambia. Full costing studies reported higher estimates than partial costing studies. Most studies (60%) originated from upper-middle-income countries, with limited data (10%) from low-income settings. CONCLUSION: This review provides a reference list of surgical procedure costs across LMICs, highlighting considerable cost variation by procedure, specialty and country. The findings underscore the need for better-quality, standardised cost data-especially from low-income countries-to inform national surgical plans, universal health coverage benefit packages and reimbursement policies.

Developing Countries↗