PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8994157

Test-indication curves.

Abstract

Test-indication curves (TICs) are tools for determining whether a test is indicated for a given patient. They apply the threshold approach of Pauker and Kassirer in graphic form. These curves are composed of two parts: the raw curve, which plots posttest probability versus pretest probability (given values for specificity and sensitivity); and the final curve, in which three straight lines are added to the raw curve by the clinician to generate a TIC for a given treatment threshold. In the final curve, the complete range of pretest probability is segregated into three zones, corresponding to the three groups described by Pauker and Kassirer: those patients in whom disease is assumed to be present and who are thus best treated empirically; at the other extreme, those who require neither testing nor treatment; and, finally, those in the middle, for whom the test is indicated, since the decision to treat would be based on the test result. Thus the clinician could consult the TIC and determine with certainty whether the test should be employed for a given patient. It also could be modified with ease for a different patient, with a different set of threshold values. TICs provide a complete, visual interpretation of a test's diagnostic power, in the context of a given treatment threshold. They foster an intuitive comprehension of Pauker and Kassirer's method, and offer the clinician a facile means to prove that a test is indicated in a given setting. By promoting the use of exactly those tests that are indicated, TICs can help spare the patient the cost, burden, and risk of unnecessary testing, and help spare the physician the cost, burden, and risk of interpreting inconclusive test results.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Bernstein. Test-indication curves.. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x9701700112

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Low-cost on-the-job peer training of nurses improved immunization coverage in Indonesia.

In Indonesia responsibility for immunizations is placed on local government health centres and on the nurses who provide the immunizations at each centre. An on-the-job peer training programme for these nurses, which was designed to improve the immunization performance of poorly performing health centres in terms of coverage and practice in Maluku province, was evaluated. Experienced immunization nurses were sent to health centres where nurses were inexperienced or performing poorly; the experienced nurses spent 1-2 weeks providing on-the-job training for the less experienced ones. An evaluation of the 13 centres that participated in the programme and the 95 that did not found that the programme increased both immunization coverage and the quality of practice. Coverage of diphtheria/pertussis/tetanus (DPT), polio, and measles vaccinations rose by about 39% in all 13 participating centres when compared with non-participating centres, and by about 54% in the 11 centres that had a functioning transportation system during the year after training. These results reflect increases in the actual number of doses given and improvements in the accuracy of reports. Potential threats to the study's validity were examined and found not to be significant. The out-of-pocket cost of the training programme was about US$ 53 per trainee or about US$ 0.05 per additional vaccine reported to have been given. The marginal cost per additional fully immunized child was estimated to be US$ 0.50.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗

Pragmatic randomised controlled trial to evaluate guidelines for the management of infertility across the primary care-secondary care interface.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of clinical guidelines on the management of infertility across the primary care-secondary care interface. DESIGN: Cluster randomised controlled trial. SETTING: General practices and NHS hospitals accepting referrals for infertility in the Greater Glasgow Health Board area. PARTICIPANTS: All 221 general practices in Glasgow; 214 completed the trial. INTERVENTION: General practices in the intervention arm received clinical guidelines developed locally. Control practices received them one year later. Dissemination of the guidelines included educational meetings. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The time from presentation to referral, investigations completed in general practice, the number and content of visits as a hospital outpatient, the time to reach a management plan, and costs for referrals from the two groups. RESULTS: Data on 689 referrals were collected. No significant difference was found in referral rates for infertility. Fewer than 1% of couples were referred inappropriately early. Referrals from intervention practices were significantly more likely to have all relevant investigations carried out (odds ratio 1.32, 95% confidence interval 1.00 to 1.75, P=0.025). 70% of measurements of serum progesterone concentrations during the midluteal phase and 34% of semen analyses were repeated at least once in hospital, despite having been recorded as normal when checked in general practice. No difference was found in the proportion of referrals in which a management plan was reached within one year or in the mean duration between first appointment and date of management plan. NHS costs were not significantly affected. CONCLUSIONS: Dissemination of infertility guidelines by commonly used methods results in a modest increase in referrals having recommended investigations completed in general practice, but there are no detectable differences in outcome for patients or reduction in costs. Clinicians in secondary care tended to fail to respond to changes in referral practice by doctors. Guidelines that aim to improve the referral process need to be disseminated and implemented so as to lead to changes in both primary care and secondary care.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗