PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9010238

BRCA1 expression is not directly responsive to estrogen.

Abstract

Expression of the breast cancer susceptibility gene, BRCA1, is induced by 17-beta estradiol (E2) in estrogen receptor containing breast cancer cell lines. Our previous studies have shown that BRCA1 transcription is also regulated with the cell cycle, reaching maximal levels just before the onset of DNA synthesis. In this study, we have examined whether the estrogen induction of BRCA1 is direct or is a result of the mitogenic activity of the hormone. Four lines of evidence lead us to conclude that E2 induces BRCA1 primarily through an increase in DNA synthesis: (1) The kinetics and magnitude of induction are different from the directly E2 inducible gene, pS2; (2) Induction of BRCA1, but not pS2, is blocked by cycloheximide indicating that de novo protein synthesis is required; (3) Other hormonal and growth factor treatments that induce DNA synthesis have a similar effect, including IGF-1, EGF and DNA synthetic flares induced by tamoxifen and retinoic acid; (4) BRCA1 genomic fragments near the 5' end of the gene containing putative estrogen response elements fail to respond to E2 when transfected into breast cancer cell lines. The most consistent explanation for these findings and other published studies is that BRCA1 transcription is induced as a result of the mitogenic activity of E2 in estrogen receptor positive cells.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J R Marks, G Huper, J P Vaughn, P L Davis, J Norris, D P McDonnell, R W Wiseman, P A Futreal, J D Iglehart. 1997-01-09. BRCA1 expression is not directly responsive to estrogen.. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1200808

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The 1H, 15N and 13C backbone resonance assignments of an intrinsically disordered region (467-696) of breast cancer type 1 susceptibility protein (BRCA1).

The tumor suppressor protein breast cancer type 1 susceptibility protein (BRCA1) plays a central role in maintaining genome stability through its involvement in DNA damage repair, transcriptional regulation, and cell-cycle control. BRCA1 functions as an obligate heterodimer with its binding partner, the BRCA1-associated RING domain protein 1 (BARD1), to coordinate accurate DNA repair. While the structured N- and C-terminal domains of BRCA1 have been well-characterized, the large central region encoded largely by exon 11 that comprises ~ 80% of the protein, is intrinsically disordered, and remains poorly structurally characterized. This intrinsically disordered region (IDR) harbors critical interaction interfaces for key proteins involved in genome maintenance, including RAD50, RAD51, MYC, and RB. Here, we report the backbone resonance assignments of a BRCA1 IDR construct spanning residues 467-696, providing a foundation for future studies aimed at understanding how the disordered central region of BRCA1 contributes to homologous recombination, interactions with BARD1, and overall BRCA1 tumor suppressor function.

BRCA1 Protein↗

Functions and mechanisms of BRCA1 in early embryonic development.

Breast Cancer Gene 1 (BRCA1) is a critical regulator of genome integrity whose dysfunction greatly increases lifetime risk of breast and ovarian cancers. While BRCA1 has been extensively studied in the contexts of adult biology and cancer, its diverse functions, including homologous recombination-mediated DNA repair, cell cycle checkpoint activation, protein ubiquitination, and transcriptional regulation, have many underexplored implications. In early embryonic development, the maternal-to-zygotic transition (MZT) and subsequent developmental processes place extraordinary demands on DNA replication fidelity, cell cycle regulation, transcriptional activation, and chromatin remodeling. These critical processes overlap strikingly with canonical functions of BRCA1, yet its function in early development is poorly characterized. In this review, we investigate BRCA1 conservation across species and connect its well-established functions to findings from developmental studies to assess its role in development. We highlight evidence of BRCA1 mitigating genome integrity loss from diverse sources, maintaining the proliferative activity needed for successful germ layer formation and early tissue morphogenesis, and regulating transcription and epigenetic modifications. Together, this synthesis supports a model where BRCA1 acts as a multi-functional and dynamic regulator of early embryogenesis. Building on this, we propose outstanding questions that could further illuminate these developmental roles. Characterization of BRCA1 in early development may not only provide important insight into the origin and progression of cancer susceptibility but may also elucidate fundamental mechanisms shaping early development.

BRCA1 Protein↗

BRCA1 does not paint the inactive X to localize XIST RNA but may contribute to broad changes in cancer that impact XIST and Xi heterochromatin.

The BRCA1 tumor suppressor involved in breast and ovarian cancer is linked to several fundamental cell regulatory processes. Recently, it was reported that BRCA1 supports localization of XIST RNA to the inactive X chromosome (Xi) in women. The apparent cytological overlap between BRCA1 and XIST RNA across the Xi raised the possibility a direct role of BRCA1 in localizing XIST. We report here that BRCA1 does not paint the Xi or XIST territory, as do markers of Xi facultative heterochromatin. A smaller BRCA1 accumulation abuts Xi, although this is not exclusive to Xi. In BRCA1 depleted normal and tumor cells, or BRCA1 reconstituted cells, BRCA1 status does not closely correlate with XIST localization, however in a BRCA1 inducible system over-expression correlated strongly with enhanced XIST expression. We confirm frequent loss of an Xi in tumor cells. In addition to mitotic loss of Xi, we find XIST RNA expression or localization frequently become compromised in cultured breast cancer cells, suggesting Xi heterochromatin may not be fully maintained. We demonstrate that complex epigenetic differences between tumor cell subpopulations can have striking effects on XIST transcription, accumulation, and localization, but this does not strictly correlate with BRCA1. Although BRCA1 can have indirect effects that impact XIST, our results do not indicate a direct and specific role in XIST RNA regulation. Rather, regulatory factors such as BRCA1 that have broad effects on chromatin or gene regulation can impact XIST RNA and the Xi. We provide preliminary evidence that this may occur as part of a wider failure of heterochromatin maintenance in some cancers.

BRCA1 Protein↗