PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9015813

Adaptive radiation therapy.

Abstract

Adaptive radiation therapy is a closed-loop radiation treatment process where the treatment plan can be modified using a systematic feedback of measurements. Adaptive radiation therapy intends to improve radiation treatment by systematically monitoring treatment variations and incorporating them to re-optimize the treatment plan early on during the course of treatment. In this process, field margin and treatment dose can be routinely customized to each individual patient to achieve a safe dose escalation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Yan, F Vicini, J Wong, A Martinez. 1997. Adaptive radiation therapy.. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155%2F42%2F1%2F008

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Usefulness of impaired chronotropic response to exercise as a predictor of mortality, independent of the severity of coronary artery disease.

Chronotropic incompetence, or an attenuated heart rate response to exercise, has been shown to be associated with an adverse outcome. It is not known whether chronotropic incompetence predicts all-cause mortality independent of angiographic severity of coronary artery disease (CAD). Study subjects included consecutive patients who underwent first-time, symptom-limited exercise treadmill testing and coronary angiography within 90 days; no patient was taking beta blockers or had a history of heart failure, valve disease, or prior revascularization. Chronotropic response was measured in 2 ways: (1) failure to reach 85% of the age-predicted maximum heart rate, and (2) a low chronotropic index, a measure of exercise heart rate response that accounts for effects of age, physical fitness, and resting heart rate. Angiographic severity of CAD was assessed using the Duke Prognostic Weight Score, with a score > or = 42 considered to be indicative of severe CAD. Among 384 eligible patients, failure to reach 85% of the age-predicted maximum heart rate occurred in 61 (16%) and a low chronotropic index was noted in 133 (35%). Severe CAD was present in 63 (16%). During 6 years of follow-up there were 56 deaths. Mortality was predicted by failure to reach target heart rate (RR 1.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01 to 3.39, chi-square = 4, p = 0.05), by severe CAD (RR 2.21, 95% CI 1.24 to 3.95, chi-square = 8, p = 0.007), and, most strongly, by a low chronotropic index (RR 2.72, 95% CI 1.60 to 4.61, chi-square = 15, p = 0.0002). In a multivariable model, low chronotropic index remained predictive of death (adjusted RR 2.22, 95% CI 1.29 to 3.82, p = 0.004), whereas severe CAD no longer predicted death (adjusted RR 1.27, 95% CI 0.70 to 2.31, p > 0.4). Thus, chronotropic incompetence is a strong and independent predictor of death, even after accounting for the angiographic severity of CAD.

Confidence Intervals↗

[Roaming through methodology. XXI. How to arrive at a weighed total score of separate items of a questionnaire].

In medical research the responses of patients to a number of items are often combined into a summary measure or total score for a more general patient characteristic, such as mobility. Clinical and statistical criteria exist for determining the weight of each question in the total score. The choice of weights may affect the differences between patients. The total score is often analysed statistically as if it had interval level of measurement, thereby allowing conclusions about the size of differences between patients, but it has merely an ordinal level. The incorrectness of the interval assumption may also affect differences between patients or patient groups. Finally, differences between patients are less dependent on the weighting of the items and on the assumption of an interval scale as the total score is based on more homogeneous items. Standard statistical software contains statistical methods for determining the homogeneity as well as the weights.

Confidence Intervals↗