PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9021683

DNA cell content studies in multiple myeloma.

Abstract

Here the current studies in cell DNA content of plasma cells (PC), from multiple myeloma (MM) patients is reviewed, focusing on two complementary aspects the detection of clonal abnormalities and the identification of the proliferative rate of PC. There is accumulating evidence that the measurement of cell DNA content by flow cytometry (FCM) is a useful parameter in the clinical evaluation of MM patients. Between 50 and 70% of MM patients display DNA aneuploidy, the majority of them being hyperdiploid. Comparing hyperdiploid with diploid patients, the former seem to display a better prognosis. Fluorescence in situ hybridization studies have confirmed that there is a high incidence of numerical chromosome abnormalities in MM and that trisomies are significantly more common than monosomies (84% vs 14%). The most frequent gains can be seen in chromosome 9 and 15 while the most common monosomies are those of chromosome 13 and X in females. The possibility of analysing the cell cycle distribution by using a propidium iodide (PI)/CD38 double staining technique may be an alternative to other more laborious methods of assessing the PC labelling index. Thus, patients with > 3% S-phase PC detected by FCM have an adverse prognosis and this parameter is one of the most important independent prognostic criteria for predicting survival in MM patients. Moreover, the number of S-phase PC, together with other prognostic factors, such as beta 2microglobulin, age and performance status can be a very useful tool for stratifying patients into groups in order to establish risk-directed therapeutic protocols.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J F San Miguel, R García-Sanz, M González, A Orfão. 1996. DNA cell content studies in multiple myeloma.. https://doi.org/10.3109/10428199609054799

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Rapid DNA replication origin licensing protects stem cell pluripotency.

Complete and robust human genome duplication requires loading minichromosome maintenance (MCM) helicase complexes at many DNA replication origins, an essential process termed origin licensing. Licensing is restricted to G1 phase of the cell cycle, but G1 length varies widely among cell types. Using quantitative single-cell analyses, we found that pluripotent stem cells with naturally short G1 phases load MCM much faster than their isogenic differentiated counterparts with long G1 phases. During the earliest stages of differentiation toward all lineages, MCM loading slows concurrently with G1 lengthening, revealing developmental control of MCM loading. In contrast, ectopic Cyclin E overproduction uncouples short G1 from fast MCM loading. Rapid licensing in stem cells is caused by accumulation of the MCM loading protein, Cdt1. Prematurely slowing MCM loading in pluripotent cells not only lengthens G1 but also accelerates differentiation. Thus, rapid origin licensing is an intrinsic characteristic of stem cells that contributes to pluripotency maintenance.

Cell Cycle↗

Modelling the checkpoint response to telomere uncapping in budding yeast.

One of the DNA damage-response mechanisms in budding yeast is temporary cell-cycle arrest while DNA repair takes place. The DNA damage response requires the coordinated interaction between DNA repair and checkpoint pathways. Telomeres of budding yeast are capped by the Cdc13 complex. In the temperature-sensitive cdc13-1 strain, telomeres are unprotected over a specific temperature range leading to activation of the DNA damage response and subsequently cell-cycle arrest. Inactivation of cdc13-1 results in the generation of long regions of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and is affected by the activity of various checkpoint proteins and nucleases. This paper describes a mathematical model of how uncapped telomeres in budding yeast initiate the checkpoint pathway leading to cell-cycle arrest. The model was encoded in the Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) and simulated using the stochastic simulation system Biology of Ageing e-Science Integration and Simulation (BASIS). Each simulation follows the time course of one mother cell keeping track of the number of cell divisions, the level of activity of each of the checkpoint proteins, the activity of nucleases and the amount of ssDNA generated. The model can be used to carry out a variety of in silico experiments in which different genes are knocked out and the results of simulation are compared to experimental data. Possible extensions to the model are also discussed.

Cell Cycle↗

Identification of Rab11 as a small GTPase binding protein for the Evi5 oncogene.

The Evi5 oncogene has recently been shown to regulate the stability and accumulation of critical G(1) cell cycle factors including Emi1, an inhibitor of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome, and cyclin A. Sequence analysis of the amino terminus of Evi5 reveals a Tre-2, Bub2, Cdc16 domain, which has been shown to be a binding partner and GTPase-activating protein domain for the Rab family of small Ras-like GTPases. Here we describe the identification of Evi5 as a candidate binding protein for Rab11, a GTPase that regulates intracellular transport and has specific roles in endosome recycling and cytokinesis. By yeast two-hybrid analysis, immunoprecipitation, and Biacore analysis, we demonstrate that Evi5 binds Rab11a and Rab11b in a GTP-dependent manner. However, Evi5 displays no activation of Rab11 GTPase activity in vitro. Evi5 colocalizes with Rab11 in vivo, and overexpression of Rab11 perturbs the localization of Evi5, redistributing it into Rab11-positive recycling endosomes. Interestingly, in vitro binding studies show that Rab11 effector proteins including FIP3 compete with Evi5 for binding to Rab11, suggesting a partitioning between Rab11-Evi5 and Rab11 effector complexes. Indeed, ablation of Evi5 by RNA interference causes a mislocalization of FIP3 at the abscission site during cytokinesis. These data demonstrate that Evi5 is a Rab11 binding protein and that Evi5 may cooperate with Rab11 to coordinate vesicular trafficking, cytokinesis, and cell cycle control independent of GTPase-activating protein function.

Cell Cycle↗