PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 9023531

Facing future challenges in general practice: a clinical method with computer support.

Abstract

This paper proposes a clinical method for general practice which is patient-centred and which ensures that the doctor's agenda is supported to secure 'best practice'. It encompasses self-learning for GPs which is patient-focused and describes the encouragement and support of patient self-care. The method attempts to be pragmatic and usable within GPs' available time. The method, however, is not solely focused on the GP; it encompasses the primary health care team and the patient. It uses clinical information systems to assist in the management of the patient care plan, to supply information to the GP and patient, in order to aid shared decision making and to quality assure clinical activity. It goes further by extending the care process to handle 'virtual' encounters in which the clinical information systems play a central role.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

I N Purves. 1996. Facing future challenges in general practice: a clinical method with computer support.. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra%2F13.6.536

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Does continuing medical education improve the way physicians conduct their practice?].

OBJECTIVES: Physicians practicing in France are required to participate in continuing education programs in accordance with the code of deontology and the official decree on controlling medical expenditures. We reviewed the literature to analyze the efficacy of such training on the way physicians conduct their practice. METHODS: We examined the following educational methodologies: diffusion of educational documents or guidelines, conferences and presentations, interventions by opinion leaders, direct visits at the physician's office. The analysis was based solely on publications issuing from work considered to be valid in accordance with the Cochrane collaboration: intervention trials, chronological series, before-after studies with control group. RESULTS: The diffusion of educational material or more formal continuing education programs do not appear to have an effect on the way physicians conduct their practice. Interventions by opinion leaders have a demonstrated impact but are rarely judged clinically significant. Visits to the physician's office by specially trained health care workers have an effect but this mode of education is costly. CONCLUSIONS: The conventional strategies, such as simple information diffusion and continuing education programs, developed to promote an evolution of clinical practices appear to be the least effective methodologies.

Education, Medical, Continuing