PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9024344

Using collaborative learning in dental education.

J H Kleffner·T Dadian
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Collaborative learning organizes students into small groups in which they assist each other to solve problems and integrate skills and knowledge. Students increase self-esteem and develop a more positive attitude toward learning. Collaborative learning can be used in classrooms, laboratories, and clinical settings. Learning is accomplished through small-group discussion, with students being responsible for helping each other achieve the desired learning outcomes. Instructors manage content through the design of the learning activities rather than by presenting the material in lectures.

Explore related subjects

Cooperative BehaviorEducation, DentalFaculty, DentalGroup ProcessesHumansLearningRoleStudents, DentalTeachingJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J H Kleffner, T Dadian. 1997. Using collaborative learning in dental education.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9024344/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1998

Cooperation: the foundation of improvement.

Cooperation--working together to produce mutual benefit or attain a common purpose--is almost inseparable from the quest for improvement. Although the case for cooperation can be made on ethical grounds, neither the motivation for nor the effects of cooperation need to be interpreted solely in terms of altruism. Cooperation can be a shrewd and pragmatic strategy for accomplishing personal goals in an interdependent system. Earlier papers in this series have explored the conceptual roots of modern approaches to improvement, which lie in systems theory. To improve systems, we must usually attend first and foremost to interactions. Among humans, "better interaction" is almost synonymous with "better cooperation." Physicians have ample opportunities and, indeed, an obligation to cooperate with other physicians in the same or different specialties, with nurses and other clinical workers, with administrators, and with patients and families. Many intellectual disciplines have made cooperation an object of study. These include anthropology; social psychology; genetics; biology; mathematics; game theory; linguistics; operations research; economics; and, of course, moral and rational philosophy. Scientifically grounded methods to enhance cooperation include developing a shared purpose; creating an open, safe environment; including all who share a common purpose and encouraging diverse viewpoints; negotiating agreement; and insisting on fairness and equity in the application of rules. These methods apply at the organizational level and at the level of the individual physician. This paper describes the application of these methods at the organizational level and focuses on one especially successful example of system-level cooperation in a care delivery site where interactions matter a great deal: the modern intensive care unit.

Cooperative Behavior↗
PubMed1998

Collaborative approaches to purchasing and managing oncology services for a prepaid population.

BACKGROUND: Change created by managed care plans is producing tensions among oncology care providers, health plans, patients, and employers. Managed care plans, which now are dominant, are engendering concern among some patients and providers because those plans limit provider choice and reimbursement, as well as inject themselves in clinical decision-making. Collaborative approaches to purchasing and managing oncology service for a prepaid population should help reduce these tensions. METHODS: This article provides a case history of how Harvard University Health Services, a managed care delivery and insurance program serving the university collaborates with contracted oncology providers. The described approach defines mutually beneficial payment and shared responsibility for care in the context of patient centered values. As a part of this collaborative effort, liberal experimental treatment coverage is offered. RESULTS: Patient care is improved because the flow of clinical information among caregivers is improved. When communication is more open, nurse case managers who work for the managed care plan also can arrange for covered services in a more expeditious manner. CONCLUSIONS: Collaboration among health plans, oncologists, and other health care providers to provide patients with high quality, cost-effective care on a fully informed basis is challenging, but not impossible. The key is to define common ground and commitment to the needs of patients among health plans and providers.

Cooperative Behavior↗