PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9028025

Do vision and haptics share common representations? Implicit and explicit memory within and between modalities.

Abstract

Previous assessments of verbal cross-modal priming have typically been conducted with the visual and auditory modalities. Within-modal priming is always found to be substantially larger than cross-modal priming, a finding that could reflect modality modularity, or alternatively, differences between the coding of visual and auditory verbal information (i.e., geometric vs. phonological). The present experiments assessed implicit and explicit memory within and between vision and haptics, where verbal information could be coded in geometric terms. Because haptic perception of words is sequential or letter-by-letter, experiments were also conducted to isolate the effects of simultaneous versus sequential processing from the manipulation of modality. Together, the results reveal no effects of modality change on implicit or explicit tests. The authors discuss representational similarities between vision and haptics as well as image mediation as possible explanations for the results.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R D Easton, K Srinivas, A J Greene. 1997. Do vision and haptics share common representations? Implicit and explicit memory within and between modalities.. https://doi.org/10.1037/%2F0278-7393.23.1.153

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The N270 component of the event-related potential reflects supramodal conflict processing in humans.

It is unclear whether crossmodal information conflict can initiate the conflict processing system indexed by a component of the event-related potential (ERP) called the N270, which previously has been observed only for visual conflict. ERPs were recorded in ten subjects, while they were engaged in a visual-auditory discrimination task. A visual stimulus of a facial photograph was followed by an auditory stimulus of Chinese syllable [a] or [i], which might be sounded by the same gender of its preceding photograph (gender match) or by different gender (gender conflict). Subjects pressed a button for gender match and another for gender conflict. A prominent N270, similar to that evoked by visual conflicts, was elicited by the auditory stimuli in gender conflict condition. It is likely that N270 reflects the brain activity of a supra-modal conflict processing system.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Rapid auditory processing and MGN morphology in microgyric rats reared in varied acoustic environments.

Adult male rats with induced microgyric lesions exhibit significant deficits in rapid auditory processing, as well as morphological alterations in the medial geniculate nucleus (MGN) of the thalamus. These findings are considered striking in light of similar anatomical and auditory processing anomalies in language disabled humans. Given evidence from clinical and animal studies that acoustic experience may alter sensory processing at behavioral and neurophysiological levels, the current study examined effects of developmental exposure to auditory stimulation on behavioral and anatomical indices in microgyric and sham rats. Stimulation (E7-P 70) included: (1). chronic white noise (80 dB) with standard housing; (2). 3 h/day of 78 dB filtered light classical music with social housing; or (3). standard acoustic environment (control) with standard housing. Microgyric effects on auditory processing and thalamic morphology were evident regardless of environmental condition. In sum, the effects of microgyria on brain and behavior appear to be robust, and largely orthogonal to any main effect of acoustic stimulation on auditory processing. These findings suggest that a more active form of acoustic stimulation (e.g., training) may be required to ameliorate the deleterious behavioral and anatomical consequences of focal microgyric lesions.

Acoustic Stimulation↗