PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 904307

Interactions among tympanometric variables.

Abstract

To gain a better understanding of tympanometric results that have been difficult to interpret, such as asymmetrical and W-shaped tympanograms, acoustic susceptance and conductance tympanograms were measured from subjects with normal hearing and from subjects with well-defined middle ear pathology. Acoustic reactance, resistance, and impedance were computed and predicted from the measured data. Asymmetrical tympanograms derive in large part from the marked asymmetry in acoustic resistance as a function of ear canal pressure. W-shaped tympanograms result from interactions between reactance and resistance that occur when the two quantities assume similar absolute values or when reactance is mass controlled. A criterion for distinguishing between W-shaped tympanograms that are normal from those that are abnormal is discussed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R H Margolis, G R Popelka. 1977. Interactions among tympanometric variables.. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.2003.447

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

ABR differences before and after dialyses.

The aim of the study was the objective evaluation of the hearing organ in children. Seven children aged 6-17 with end stage renal failure treated by haemodialysis were examined. Four- to five-hour dialyses were performed 2-3 times a week. Pure-tone audiometry was normal in five children. The reactions of brain stem responses (latency and interpeak latency) were analysed before and after haemodialyses. We conclude that the ABR differences were connected with biochemical parameters of uraemia. The present study is a preliminary one and will be continued in the future.

Acoustic Impedance Tests

Topodiagnostic assessment of occupational noise-induced hearing loss using distortion-product otoacoustic emissions compared to the short increment sensitivity index test.

Because the efforts needed to produce an "automatic audiogram" by means of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) are still experimental, their capacity to produce objective topodiagnostic information must still be defined. In the present study results of the short increment sensitivity index testing (SISI) test in 97 patients with noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) were compared with those of a DP-gram. Pure tone, speech and impedance audiometry, SISI tests and DPOAE measurements were performed on all patients. SISI was measured in both ears of 93 patients and unilaterally in 4 patients. SISI was also determined at two frequencies in 46 patients. Six measurements were rejected because of conductive hearing losses in adjacent frequencies. In all, 230 measurements could be compared. After classifying topodiagnostic results of the SISI test and DP-gram into cochlear, inconclusive and retrocochlear lesions, statistically significant correlations were found and differences were noted in only 18% of cases. Findings demonstrated the superiority of DPOAE to the SISI test in obtaining topodiagnostic information about inner ear disease.

Acoustic Impedance Tests

The diagnostic and prognostic value of eardrum mobility in otitis media with effusion.

Diagnostic and prognostic values of eardrum mobility were determined by pneumatic otoscopy in 37 patients (56 ears) having otitis media with effusion (OME). Eardrum mobility was impaired or lost in less than half of the ears (46.4%), while a tympanogram detected 77.8% of OME. In 27 of the 37 patients (42 of the 56 ears), aeration of the middle ear space was examined by CT and demonstrated that the presence or absence of aeration was significantly correlated with the presence or absence of eardrum mobility. In another 38 children (62 ears with OME), effect of antibiotics was correlated with eardrum mobility before treatment, and the improvement rate was found to be significantly higher in ears with positive mobility of eardrum (34.3%) than in ears without eardrum mobility (10.0%). These results indicate that eardrum mobility is a good prognostic indicator of OME rather than its diagnostic indicator alone.

Acoustic Impedance Tests