PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9047362

Structural rules and conformational compensations in the tRNA L-form.

Abstract

The mitochondrial tRNAs (mtRNA) of five distinct, secondary structure types have been identified in the tRNA sequence compilation, and the three-dimensional modeling for representative sequences of these types has been carried out using a new criterion for the lengths of the helical domains and connector regions in a full-sized tRNA conformation. This criterion has been derived from the analysis of the known structures of cytosolic tRNAs and states that in the tRNA structure nucleotide 59 of the T-loop should stack onto Domain 1. To ensure this, Domain 1 must have 12 layers of stacked nucleotides, and in the case of a deletion of a base-pair in the T-stem, an additional 13th layer is required. Although a number of mitochondrial tRNAs harbored deficiencies in this criterion and, therefore, could not be modeled directly, this disability could be corrected and modeling accomplished by invoking structural compensations derived from one of two unusual aspects of these tRNAs. One class of these tRNAs contained an unpaired nucleotide in their anticodon stem, and their three-dimensional structure was successfully modeled when the unpaired nucleotide was intercalated into the helical domain of the stem. The second class contained more than the required number of nucleotides connecting the tRNA helical domains; the conformational flexibility of these nucleotides allowed them to take the place of the absent layers. The conformational compensation that we report rationalizes disparate features of these tRNAs and suggests that the stacking of nucleotide 59 on Domain 1 is an essential feature of the three-dimensional L-form of tRNA.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Steinberg, F Leclerc, R Cedergren. 1997-02-21. Structural rules and conformational compensations in the tRNA L-form.. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1996.0803

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Sp1 is essential for p16 expression in human diploid fibroblasts during senescence.

BACKGROUND: p16(INK4a) tumor suppressor protein has been widely proposed to mediate entrance of the cells into the senescent stage. Promoter of p16(INK4a) gene contains at least five putative GC boxes, named GC-I to V, respectively. Our previous data showed that a potential Sp1 binding site, within the promoter region from -466 to -451, acts as a positive transcription regulatory element. These results led us to examine how Sp1 and/or Sp3 act on these GC boxes during aging in cultured human diploid fibroblasts. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Mutagenesis studies revealed that GC-I, II and IV, especially GC-II, are essential for p16(INK4a) gene expression in senescent cells. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) and ChIP assays demonstrated that both Sp1 and Sp3 bind to these elements and the binding activity is enhanced in senescent cells. Ectopic overexpression of Sp1, but not Sp3, induced the transcription of p16(INK4a). Both Sp1 RNAi and Mithramycin, a DNA intercalating agent that interferes with Sp1 and Sp3 binding activities, reduced p16(INK4a) gene expression. In addition, the enhanced binding of Sp1 to p16(INK4a) promoter during cellular senescence appeared to be the result of increased Sp1 binding affinity, not an alteration in Sp1 protein level. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: All these results suggest that GC- II is the key site for Sp1 binding and increase of Sp1 binding activity rather than protein levels contributes to the induction of p16(INK4a) expression during cell aging.

Base Composition↗

Application of CE for determination of DNA base composition.

DNA base composition expressed as mol% of guanine plus cytosine (% GC) or GC content is a key parameter of bacterial taxonomy and genomic analyses. Direct chemical determination methods such as HPLC as well as indirect methods based on physical properties of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), melting point (T(m)), and buoyant density (B(d)) have been conventionally applied to determine the GC content. However, these methods require relatively large amounts of sample DNA, time, and labor. We have developed a protocol to determine the GC content by fine separation of nucleosides with CZE. Genomic DNAs with known GC content from 23 bacterial strains were determined by CE at the optimized conditions of 27 degrees C, 20 kV in 50 mM of NaHCO(3) (pH 9.0) and 70 mM SDS added. Nucleosides from <1 microg of DNA hydrolyzed with nuclease-P1 and bacterial alkaline phosphatase were separated in a 75 microm wide and 80 cm long silica capillary. The nucleoside peak areas were determined at 254 nm in less than 12 min. The CE-based determination of GC content requires only small amounts of DNA, and thus should be applicable to environmental genomics (metagenomics), as >90% of environmental micro-organisms are nonculturable and produce only small amounts of genomic DNA.

Base Composition↗