PubMed · 9047451
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
K Kasamatsu, I Nishio. 1996. [Right bundle branch block].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9047451/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
OBJECTIVE: In this paper we present an attempt at noninvasive imaging of distributed myocardial electrical activity in patients suffering from myocardial infarction and in healthy subjects. Although advances have been made, noninvasive three-dimensional imaging of cardiac electrophysiological activity is still in its infancy and extending our knowledge of cardiac electrophysiological properties may be a valuable guide in the treatment of patients with coronary artery disease. METHODS: Magnetic field mapping data formed the input for an inverse solution that is based on a multiple dipole model. The lead field normalized minimum norm least square criterion was applied to predefined myocardial source geometry. Current density distributions were calculated for the left ventricle during ventricular depolarization. Images from two patients with previous myocardial infarction were compared to images from two healthy subjects. RESULTS: Low regional and global current density was found in the infarction patients. Regions of low current density corresponded to infarcted segments. The images of the healthy subjects displayed less marked areas of low current density. CONCLUSION: The proposed multiple dipole model may be able to distinguish viable from scarred myocardium. A prospective clinical study should be undertaken to investigate the spatial resolution and the diagnostic performance of this method.
The spatial resolution of body surface potential maps (BSPMs) and magnetic field maps (MFMs) is investigated by means of an anatomically accurate computer model of the human ventricular myocardium. BSPMs and MFMs are calculated for the simulated activation sequences initiated at 35 pre-excitation sites located along the atrioventricular (AV) ring of the epicardium. Changes in the BSPMs and MFMs corresponding to different pre-excitation sites are quantified in terms of the correlation coefficient r. The spatial resolution (selectivity) for a given pre-excitation site is defined as the half-distance between those neighbouring locations at which morphological features of maps, in terms of r, become distinct (r < 0.95). It is found that, at 28 ms after the onset of pre-excitation and with no noise added, this distance +/- SD, for all sites along the AV ring for the 117-lead BSPMs, is 0.83 +/- 0.32 cm, and for the 64-lead and 128-lead MFMs it is 1.54 +/- 0.84 cm and 1.15 +/- 0.43 cm, respectively. The findings suggest that, when features of non-invasively recorded electrocardiographic and magnetocardiographic map patterns are used for identifying accessory pathways in patients suffering from WPW syndrome, BSPMs are likely to provide more detailed information for guiding the ablative treatment than MFMs. For some sites MFMs provide more information. Both modalities may provide additional assistance to the cardiologist in locating the site of the accessory pathway.
Different factors are investigated that may affect the accuracy of an inverse solution that uses a single-dipole equivalent generator, in a standardised inhomogeneous torso model, when localising the pre-excitation sites. An anatomical model of the human ventricular myocardium is used to simulate body surface potential maps (BSPMs) and magnetic field maps (MFMs) for 35 pre-excitation sites positioned on the epicardial surface along the atrioventricular ring. The sites of pre-excitation activity are estimated by the single-dipole method, and the measure for the accuracy of the localisation is the localisation error, defined as the distance between the location of the best-fitting single dipole and the actual site of pre-excitation in the ventricular model. The findings indicate that, when the electrical properties of the volume conductor and lead positions are precisely known and the 'measurement' noise is added to the simulated BSPMs and MFMs, the single-dipole method optimally localises the pre-excitation activity 20 ms after the onset of pre-excitation, within 0.71 +/- 0.28 cm and 0.65 +/- 0.30 cm using BSPMs and MFMs, respectively. When the standard torso model is used to localise the sites of onset of the pre-excitation sequence initiated in four individualised torso models, the maximum errors are as high as 2.6-3.0 cm (even though the average error, for both the BSPM and MFM localisations, remains within the 1.0-1.5 cm range). In spite of these shortcomings, it is thought that single-dipole localisations can be useful for non-invasive pre-interventional planning.