PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 9054310

Statistical error.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Erdinc, O Ahmet. 1997. Statistical error.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9054310/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Postchemotherapy residual masses in germ cell tumor patients: content, clinical features, and prognosis. Medical Research Council Testicular Tumour Working Party.

BACKGROUND: In a retrospective study that included a detailed histopathologic review, the clinicopathologic features of patients with germ cell tumors (GCT) and resectable residual masses after chemotherapy were assessed. METHODS: Histologic material from 153 patients was available for review. Recorded details included primary histologic diagnosis, location, size and number of metastases, marker levels before and after chemotherapy, and completeness of surgical excision. A median of seven histologic sections per resection were reviewed by two pathologists independently (and together when disagreement occurred). In each case, details were recorded regarding fibrosis, necrosis, hemorrhage, embryonal carcinoma (undifferentiated teratoma), yolk sac tumor, choriocarcinoma (trophoblastic tumor), differentiated teratoma (mature and immature), dysplasia in somatic tissues, and non- germ cell tumor (GCT) malignancies. The percentage of the sample that each of these components comprised was also estimated. RESULTS: The median postchemotherapy follow-up time was 7 years, and 38 of 153 patients (25%) experienced disease progression. In a multivariate analysis, incomplete resection of all residual masses (in 38 patients) and the presence of malignant elements (in 23 patients) were independent risk factors for progression. In the subset of patients in whom all masses were completely resected, the presence of embryonal carcinoma (undifferentiated teratoma) was the single most significant risk factor for progression. Seven percent of patients had this factor, which was associated with a 2-year progression free survival rate of 12.5%, compared with 88.0% where this component was absent. CONCLUSIONS: Progression free survival can be predicted well by the completeness of excision of residual masses and the presence of malignant germ cell elements. The latter confers a relatively poor prognosis even if all of these elements are completely resected.

Disease-Free Survival

The clinical implications of hydronephrosis and the level of ureteral obstruction in stage IIIB cervical cancer.

PURPOSE: There are two criteria for the diagnosis of Stage IIIB cervical cancer in the FIGO staging system: tumor fixation to the pelvic side wall and/or the presence of hydronephrosis due to tumor. However, we often encounter hydronephrosis without tumor fixed to the pelvic side wall or the level of ureteral obstruction not corresponding to the main tumor mass in the pelvis. The clinical implication of these phenomena remains unclear. We investigated the Stage IIIB population treated at the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology and hypothesized that, if hydronephrosis presents without tumor fixation to the pelvic side wall or if the level of ureteral obstruction is above the main pelvic tumor mass, it most likely resulted from external compression of ureter(s) by enlarged lymph nodes and, consequently, a worse outcome is expected. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 1959 to 1989, there were 297 patients with Stage IIIB cervical cancer who received definitive radiation therapy at the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology and were assessable for the presence of hydronephrosis and the level of ureteral obstruction. There were 281 patients who presented with tumor fixed to the pelvic side wall, and 62 of them were associated with concurrent hydronephrosis. An additional 16 patients presented with hydronephrosis without tumor fixation to the pelvic side wall. Among these 78 documented cases of hydronephrosis, the level of ureteral obstruction was above the true pelvis in 39 patients, and below the true pelvis in the other 39. Radiation therapy was individualized according to tumor extension and configuration; para-aortic lymph nodes were not routinely treated except in patients with clinical evidence of nodal metastasis. RESULTS: The progression-free survival (PFS) at 5 years was 35% in 62 patients with hydronephrosis and tumor fixed to the pelvic side wall vs. 43% in 213 patients with tumor fixed to the pelvic side wall only (p=0.12). However, PFS at 5 years decreased to 23% in 16 patients who presented with hydronephrosis without tumor fixation to the pelvic side wall (p < 0.001). When the level of ureteral obstruction was investigated, 5-year PFS was 39% vs. 22%, respectively, for the obstruction below vs. above the true pelvis (p=0.02). The majority of patients with ureteral obstruction above the true pelvis died of distant metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: The additional presence of hydronephrosis did not significantly worsen the PFS among Stage IIIB patients with tumor fixation to the pelvic side wall. However, hydronephrosis without tumor extending to the pelvic side wall or the level of ureteral obstruction above the true pelvis was associated with poor outcome due to a significant increase in distant failure. We propose that this population be separated from current Stage IIIB classification.

Disease-Free Survival