Mammographic image analysis.

R P Highnam; J M Brady; B J Shepstone

doi:10.1016/s0720-048x(96)01110-2

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9056146

Mammographic image analysis.

R P Highnam·J M Brady·B J Shepstone

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We describe our recent progress aimed at computer analysis of mammograms. The overall aim is to provide the clinician with reliable quantitative information. We summarise a representation we have developed of the 'interesting' (non-adipose) tissue in a breast, then put the representation to work in three ways: (i) to propose a new quantitative measure to aid in diagnosing masses; (ii) to explore the possibility of reducing by half the radiation dose required for a mammogram; and (iii) recalling some of the results that can be provided by differential compression mammography, in which mammograms are taken at two slightly different compressions.

Explore related subjects

Guidelines as Topic Humans Image Processing, Computer-Assisted Mammography Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

R P Highnam, J M Brady, B J Shepstone. 1997. Mammographic image analysis.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0720-048x(96)01110-2

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Extending basic principles of measurement models to the design and validation of Patient Reported Outcomes.

A recently published article by the Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust presents guidelines for selecting and evaluating health status and health-related quality of life measures used in health outcomes research. In their article, they propose a number of validation and performance criteria with which to evaluate such self-report measures. We provide an alternate, yet complementary, perspective by extending the types of measurement models which are available to the instrument designer. During psychometric development or selection of a Patient Reported Outcome measure it is necessary to determine which, of the five types of measurement models, the measure is based on; 1) a Multiple Effect Indicator model, 2) a Multiple Cause Indicator model, 3) a Single Item Effect Indicator model, 4) a Single Item Cause Indicator model, or 5) a Mixed Multiple Indicator model. Specification of the measurement model has a major influence on decisions about item and scale design, the appropriate application of statistical validation methods, and the suitability of the resulting measure for a particular use in clinical and population-based outcomes research activities.

Guidelines as Topic↗

PubMed2006

International guidance on the establishment of quality assurance programmes for radioactivity measurement in nuclear medicine.

A new guidance document for the implementation of quality assurance (QA) programmes for nuclear medicine radioactivity measurement, produced by the International Atomic Energy Agency, is described. The proposed programme is based on the principles of ISO 17025 and will enable laboratories, particularly in developing countries, to provide consistent, safe and effective radioactivity measurement services to the nuclear medicine community.

Guidelines as Topic↗

PubMed2006

A cautionary tale.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Guidelines as Topic↗