PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9061753

Skeletal dysplasias detectable by DNA analysis.

Abstract

The emerging data of the last few years outlining the molecular basis of skeletal dysplasias has been instructive in several respects. The number of genetic loci involved appears to be much fewer than anticipated. This is offset by the identification of several instances where phenotypically distinct entities are found to be allelic variants. With respect to diagnosis by DNA, most of the conditions recognized have several different mutations described. Consequently, while mutation analysis may be possible in a given case, close liaison with the investigating laboratory is essential if optimal results are to be obtained. Achondroplasia is unusual in that there is a common mutation and the other mutations related to the phenotype appear to cluster to a few codons. This review highlights the relationship between phenotypes of skeletal malformation, their underlying loci and mutations. These mutations appear to mediate their phenotypic effects through a diverse range of genetic mechanisms.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W Reardon. 1996. Skeletal dysplasias detectable by DNA analysis.. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0223(199612)16%3A13%3C1221%3A%3Aaid-pd97%3E3.0.co%3B2-e

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Severe hypertelorism, midface prominence, prominent/simple ears, severe myopia, borderline intelligence, and bone fragility in two brothers: new syndrome?

We report on two brothers, born to double first cousin Jordanian Arab parents, with a syndrome comprising severe hypertelorism with upslanted palpebral fissures, brachycephaly, abnormal ears, sloping shoulders, enamel hypoplasia, and osteopenia with repeated fractures. Both have severe myopia, mild to moderate sensori-neural hearing loss and borderline intelligence. Results of chromosome analysis were normal as was a FISH assay for subtelomeric rearrangements. The father has mild hypertelorism but the family history is otherwise unremarkable. We think that this represents a previously unrecognized autosomal or X-linked recessive syndrome.

Bone Diseases, Developmental↗

Efficacy of MRI in classifying proximal focal femoral deficiency.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of MRI in classifying PFFD and to compare MRI to radiographic classification of PFFD. DESIGN: Radiographic and MRI classification of the cases was performed utilizing the Amstutz classification system. PATIENTS: Retrospective evaluation of radiographs and MRI exams in nine hips of eight patients with proximal focal femoral deficiency was performed by two radiologists. RESULTS: The cases were classified by radiographs as Amstutz 1: n=3, Amstutz 3: n=3, Amstutz 4: n=1 and Amstutz 5: n=2. The classifications based on MRI were Amstutz 1: n=6, Amstutz 2: n=1, Amstutz 3: n=0, Amstutz 4: n=2 and Amstutz 5: n=0. Three hips demonstrated complete agreement. There were six discordant hips. In two of the discordant cases, follow-up radiographs of 6 months or greater intervals were available and helped to confirm MRI findings. Errors in radiographic evaluation consisted of overestimating the degree of deficiency. CONCLUSION: MRI is more accurate than radiographic evaluation for the classification of PFFD, particularly early on, prior to the ossification of cartilaginous components in the femurs. Since radiographic evaluation tends to overestimate the degree of deficiency, MRI is a more definitive modality for evaluation of PFFD.

Bone Diseases, Developmental↗