PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9064125

[Frozen section diagnosis using telepathology].

Abstract

DEFINITION: Since 1992 we transfer digitalized frozen section images by means of videomicroscope and a personal computer through the public telephone network (ISDN) to the Institut of Pathology at the University Hospital in Basel. The aim of this study is to determine whether the quality of frozen section diagnosis obtained by telepathology is comparable to the conventional one. METHOD: The frozen section diagnoses by telepathology from Oct. 1992 to May 1996 (n = 94) are compared to the paraffin sections performed in each case after the primary examination. The result is then compared to the well documented data of conventional frozen section diagnosis in the literature. RESULTS: From Oct. 1992 to May 1996 we performed 94 frozen sections. In 84 cases the diagnosis was correct compared to the paraffin section (89%). The sensitivity to detect a malignant tumor was 92%, the specifity 100%. Four examinations were not conclusive and one examination had to be canceled because of technical problems. DISCUSSION: In the literature, 92% of malignancy is diagnosed by conventional frozen section [1]. Telepathology gives the same result.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B Steffen, D Gianom, C Winkler, H J Hosch, M Oberholzer, M Famos. 1997. [Frozen section diagnosis using telepathology].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9064125/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Four years experience with teleneuropathology.

Between 2002 and 2005, we made 343 intraoperative frozen section diagnoses with a telepathology system, which connected a neurosurgical department to our department of pathology. An expert neuropathologist performed at least one brief gross examination, and this was followed by a smear preparation and a frozen section slide for each case. Frozen section diagnosis lasted on average 26.1 min, calculated from the beginning of gross examination until the surgeon was given the diagnosis. The majority of cases (283 or 83%) were diagnosed in 15-40 min. The mean time needed for macroscopic examination was 3.0 min, time for staining 4.2 min, smear diagnosis took 5.4 min and time for histological diagnosis 10.7 min. Telemicroscopy of a smear slide took 11 times longer compared with light microscopy, and telemicroscopy of a frozen section slide took 16 times longer than with light microscopy. In 6% of cases, the telepathology software posed technical problems, which delayed the time of diagnosis, but not by more than 4 min. We were able to render a diagnosis in all cases (system reliability 100%). After eliminating sampling errors (i.e. cases with no diagnostic material in the frozen section slides and/or in smear preparations), the diagnostic accuracy for telepathology was 97.9%.

Frozen Sections↗