PubMed · 9068267
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
T E Acree. 1997-03-01. GC/olfactometry.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9068267/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Two Corynebacterium diphtheriae strains were analyzed by assays employing a battery of highly purified fluorescent lectins. From 22 lectins tested only seven with affinity to receptor molecules containing N-acetylglucosamine (D-GlcNAc), N-acetylgalactosamine (D-GalNAc), galactose (D-Gal), mannose-like (D-Man-like) and sialic acid residues showed positive fluorescent labeling. A higher reactivity of Triticum vulgaris (WGA), which binds to sialic acid and/or beta-D-GlcNAc-containing residues, and Bandeiraea simplicifolia II (BS-II), which recognizes alpha and beta-D-GlcNAc units, was shown by the sucrose-fermenting strain. Ricinus communis (RCA-I), which recognizes D-Gal units in addition to both Glycine max (SBA) and Artocarpus integrifolia (Jacaline) agglutinins that bind to D-GalNAc-containing residues, reacted preferentially with the sucrose-negative strain. Canavalia ensiformis (Con A), which recognizes D-Man-like receptors, reacted with both sucrose-fermenting and non-sucrose-fermenting C. diphtheriae biotypes. However, higher interaction was observed with the non-sucrose-fermenting strain. Fluorescence of WGA binding was significantly decreased by neuraminidase treatment suggesting the presence of an exposed sialic acid moiety on C. diphtheriae surfaces. Binding assay using radiolabeled [125I]WGA essentially confirmed the lectin fluorescence studies. N-Acetylneuraminic acid moieties were detected in whole cell hydrolysates as assessed by thin-layer and gas-liquid chromatography. The data indicate differences on the cell surface saccharide ligands between the sucrose-fermenting and the non-sucrose-fermenting C. diphtheriae strains.
The possibilities of using solid-phase microextraction to determine residues of pesticides in honey have been examined. For this purpose, three types of fiber have been assayed: polyacrylate of 85 microns thickness, and polydimethylsiloxane of 7 and 100 microns thickness. They have been applied to the extraction of 21 pesticides of different chemical families. The effects of the temperature, extraction time and ionic strength on the microextraction have been studied, proposing the most adequate for each fiber. Under optimized conditions, precision, intervals of linearity and detection limits were evaluated.
Two commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) for total polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) and carcinogenic PAH (C-PAH) were evaluated. The testing procedures were refined for application to screening PAH and C-PAH in house dust and soil samples for human exposure studies. The overall method precision expressed as percent relative standard deviation (%RSD) of triplicate real world dust and soil samples was within +/- 29% (12-29%) for PAH ELISA and +/- 21% (5.9-21%) for C-PAH ELISA. Spike recoveries from real world dust/soil samples were 114 +/- 30% for phenanthrene from PAH ELISA and 120 +/- 8.2% for benzo[a]pyrene from C-PAH ELISA. The overall method accuracy for PAH and C-PAH assays cannot be assessed for multiple PAH components in dust/soil samples (which represent real-world samples), because of the assays' cross reactivities with other PAH components. Over 100 dust/soil samples from 13 North Carolina homes and 22 Arizona homes were analyzed by PAH and C-PAH assays, as well as by the conventional gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) method. Statistical analysis showed that dust/soil PAH data from ELISA and GC/MS methods are significantly different. In general PAH ELISA responses were higher than PAH GC/MS responses. The regression analysis showed that the linear relationship between ELISA and GC/MS measurements is not strong in the combined data. The relationship became stronger for the data from the same type of dust/soil samples. The screening performance of ELISA was evaluated based on the frequency distribution of ELISA and GC/MS data. The results indicated that the ELISA PAH and C-PAH assays cannot be used as a quantitative analytical tool for determining PAH in real-world dust/soil samples. However, the ELISA is an effective screening tool for ranking PAH concentrations in similar types of real world dust/soil samples.