PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 9080787

Transfer across form and modality in implicit and explicit memory.

Abstract

Three experiments examined transfer across form (words/pictures) and modality (visual/auditory) in written word, auditory word, and pictorial implicit memory tests, as well as on a free recall task. Experiment I showed no significant transfer across form on any of the three implicit memory tests, and an asymmetric pattern of transfer across modality. In contrast, the free recall results revealed a very different picture. Experiment 2 further investigated the asymmetric modality effects obtained for the implicit memory measures by employing articulatory suppression and picture naming to control the generation of phonological codes. Finally, Experiment 3 examined the effects of overt word naming and covert picture labelling on transfer between study and test form. The results of the experiments are discussed in relation to Tulving and Schacter's (1990) Perceptual Representation Systems framework and Roediger's (1990) Transfer Appropriate Processing theory.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D C Berry, S Banbury, L Henry. 1997. Transfer across form and modality in implicit and explicit memory.. https://doi.org/10.1080/713755685

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Automatic alerting does not speed late motoric processes in a reaction-time task.

When an irrelevant 'accessory' stimulus is presented at about the same time as the imperative signal in a choice reaction time-task, the latency of the voluntary response is markedly reduced. The most prominent cognitive theories agree that this effect is attributable to a brief surge in arousal ('automatic alerting'), but they disagree over whether the facilitation is localized to a late, low-level motoric process or to an earlier stage, the process of orienting to and then perceptually categorizing the reaction stimulus. To test these alternative hypotheses, we used the onset of the lateralized readiness potential (a movement-related brain potential) as a temporal landmark to partition mean reaction time into two time segments. The first segment included the time required to perceive the visual stimulus and decide which hand to react with; the second included only motoric processes. Presentation of an irrelevant acoustic stimulus shortened the first interval but had no effect on the second. We therefore rejected the motoric hypothesis.

Auditory Perception